Key Points

The Karnataka High Court has ordered the interim release of four event management professionals connected to the tragic Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede on June 4. The staffers from RCB and DNA Entertainment Networks were arrested but will now be released with the condition of surrendering their passports. The court's intervention comes after intense legal arguments challenging the arrests as potentially politically motivated. The incident, which resulted in 11 fatalities, continues to be investigated by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).

Key Points: RCB Staffers Get Bail in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case

  • Karnataka HC grants interim release to four arrested event organizers
  • Staffers must surrender passports while investigation continues
  • DNA Entertainment and RCB challenge criminal case in high court
  • Stampede at celebration event claimed 11 lives
3 min read

Stampede case: Karnataka HC orders release of RCB, DNA firm staffers, asks them to surrender passports

Karnataka HC orders interim release of RCB and DNA event firm staffers in fatal Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede investigation

"There is no connection between the case and the company's wealth - Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar"

Bengaluru, June 12

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday ordered the interim release of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) Marketing Head Nikhil Sosale and three others associated with DNA Entertainment Networks Private Ltd in connection with the June 4 Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede case, which claimed 11 lives.

The DNA Entertainment Networks Private Ltd staffers are Sunil Mathew, S. Kiran Kumar, and N.P. Shamant Mavinakere.

A bench of Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar allowed their petitions challenging the arrests but directed them to surrender their passports.

The four had been arrested in connection with the stampede incident, and they are currently lodged in the Bengaluru Central Prison.

The High Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on the petitions.

The CID, which has taken over the investigation, had sought their custody.

Counsels for the petitioners submitted that their arrest was against the law and was carried out following instructions from Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. They also argued that the arrests were illegally made by the government to escape blame for the tragic stampede incident.

Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty, representing the state government, stated that it is incorrect to claim the arrests were made following the Chief Minister's directions. Quoting earlier Supreme Court orders and verdicts, he submitted that standard guidelines were followed by the police during the arrests.

The AG further stated that the petitioners had provided false information to the court. He added that the arrested individuals were also provided written reasons for their arrests. He pleaded that the court should not grant them any interim relief or pass release orders.

He also submitted that the RCB franchise is a cash-rich, billion-dollar company.

At this, the bench intervened, observing that there is no connection between the case and the company's wealth.

The AG further submitted that the accused were arrested when they attempted to escape to a different state. He alleged that they had made social media posts on X to draw people to the event and were responsible for the deaths of 11 people.

DNA Entertainment Networks Pvt Ltd, named as an accused in the FIR by the Karnataka police in the stampede case, approached the High Court on Monday seeking the quashing of the FIR against it.

DNA submitted to the court that the plan to hold the celebration event at the Chinnaswamy Stadium was made by the government and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA). The government itself had invited people to participate in the celebration.

The RCB franchise had earlier approached the HC seeking to quash the criminal case lodged against them in the stampede case.

Elaborating on the RCB's preparations to hold the event, the petition stated that extensive discussions were held with the DNA Event Management firm and the officials of the KSCA.

The petition further underlined that the police gave oral confirmation for the victory parade and celebrations on June 4. RCB had announced that entry to the stadium was strictly upon registration on the official website and the issuance of passes. This was done to restrict the crowd to the limited capacity of the stadium, it stated.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
This is such a tragic incident. While I understand the need for accountability, arresting event organizers seems like a knee-jerk reaction. The government should also take responsibility for crowd management. Our system always looks for scapegoats instead of fixing systemic issues. 😔
R
Rahul S.
High Court's decision makes sense. You can't just arrest people without proper evidence. The police should have conducted thorough investigation first. Also, why is the Advocate General bringing up RCB's wealth? That's completely irrelevant to the case!
A
Ananya M.
As a Bengaluru resident, I'm heartbroken by this tragedy. But I've attended many events at Chinnaswamy Stadium - the entry system through passes has always worked well before. Something went terribly wrong this time. Both organizers AND police failed in their duties. Proper inquiry needed, not political blame game.
V
Vikram J.
The real issue is our poor crowd management systems across India. Be it religious events, cricket matches or political rallies - we never learn from past tragedies. Govt should focus on creating proper SOPs instead of this arrest drama. #SafetyFirst
S
Sneha P.
While I'm glad the court ordered their release, we must remember 11 lives were lost. Compensation for victims' families should be priority. Also, the stadium capacity and entry systems need complete overhaul. Can't let such incidents happen again. 💔
K
Karthik R.
The Advocate General's arguments sound weak - first talking about RCB's wealth, then about social media posts. If they have solid evidence, present it properly. Right now it seems like they're just throwing whatever sticks at the wall. Judiciary did the right thing here.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50