Key Points

South Korea's ex-first lady Kim Keon Hee is under investigation for allegedly accepting a luxury necklace in exchange for influencing a government appointment. Prosecutors are weighing bribery charges, though legal hurdles remain since she held no official position. The case adds to her legal troubles, as she’s already detained over unrelated corruption allegations. Meanwhile, her husband, former President Yoon Suk Yeol, has refused to cooperate with investigators.

Key Points: Ex-South Korea First Lady Kim Faces Bribery Probe Over Luxury Necklace

  • Kim allegedly received a luxury necklace for influencing a govt appointment
  • Prosecutors consider bribery mediation charges due to her lack of public office
  • Her husband, ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol, refuses to cooperate with the probe
  • Kim is already in custody over separate stock manipulation and election meddling cases
3 min read

South Korea: Special counsel weighs bribery charges against ex-first lady Kim over luxury necklace

Special prosecutors weigh charges against Kim Keon Hee for allegedly accepting a Van Cleef necklace in exchange for a government job favor.

"Seohee Construction officials submitted the Van Cleef & Arpels necklace and confessed to gifting it to Kim – Yonhap News Agency"

Seoul, Aug 17

Special prosecutors investigating corruption allegations against South Korea's former first lady Kim Keon Hee were deliberating over the charges to press against her after securing a luxury necklace she allegedly accepted in exchange for a personnel appointment favour, legal sources said on Sunday.

Last week, special counsel Min Joong-ki's team said Seohee Construction officials submitted the Van Cleef & Arpels necklace and confessed to gifting the item to Kim right after her husband, former President Yoon Suk Yeol, was elected in March 2022, seeking a government job for the company chairman's son-in-law.

The son-in-law, a former prosecutor, was appointed as the chief of staff for then Prime Minister Han Duck-soo three months later, reports Yonhap news agency.

Kim has reportedly denied the allegation, arguing that the necklace she wore during a 2022 trip to Europe was not authentic.

Given the evidence, special prosecutors could press charges of bribery through mediation against Kim, considering that she did not hold any public office and did not have any authority to make any personnel appointments.

Under the law, bribery charges apply to people typically holding public office who provide a benefit in exchange for the bribe, compared with bribery through mediation, when a third party is involved to facilitate the transaction.

In order to apply bribery charges, special prosecutors would need to prove that Yoon himself accepted the necklace, placing Kim as an accomplice in the case.

A bribery conviction could lead to a term of 10 years or more if the bribe exceeds 100 million won (US$72,000), while bribery through mediation carries a penalty of up to five years in prison.

If Yoon were unaware of the transaction and only found out after it happened, it would be difficult to apply bribery charges even if he took part in the personnel appointment process.

Min's team, however, has yet to question Yoon, who has refused to cooperate with the investigation even after a court issued a detention warrant allowing special prosecutors to forcibly bring him in.

Kim is also currently under custody after a court issued a warrant to arrest her last week on charges of involvement in a stock manipulation scheme, meddling in candidate nominations for the 2022 parliamentary by-elections and 2024 general elections, and receiving luxury gifts from the Unification Church through a shaman in exchange for business favours.

She appeared for questioning on Thursday but exercised her right to remain silent on most of the charges raised against her.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The necklace drama reminds me of our own politicians' love for luxury items. At least they're being investigated properly there - wish our agencies showed similar spine!
R
Rohit P
Why do first ladies always get involved in scandals? Whether it's South Korea or India, they should focus on social work, not power games. Disappointing!
S
Sarah B
The "not authentic" defense is laughable. Reminds me of our politicians claiming they wear "fake" watches worth lakhs. Corruption has no borders it seems!
K
Kavya N
While I condemn corruption, we should also appreciate that South Korea's justice system is acting independently. In India, such cases often get buried under political pressure.
V
Vikram M
The involvement of a shaman is the most shocking part! Shows how superstition and corruption go hand in hand across cultures. We see this in India too with babas influencing politicians.
M
Michael C
Interesting to see how the law distinguishes between direct bribery and mediation. India could learn from such legal nuances to strengthen our anti-corruption framework.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50