South Korea's Political Crisis: Ex-PM Faces 15-Year Prison Term in Martial Law Case

South Korean prosecutors are seeking a 15-year prison sentence for former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo. They accuse him of failing to stop what they call an "insurrection" by former President Yoon Suk Yeol. The special counsel described the case as an act of terror against Korean democracy. Han is expected to receive the court's verdict in January next year.

Key Points: South Korea Demands 15-Year Prison Term for Ex-PM Han

  • Prosecutors accuse Han of abandoning duty to stop presidential insurrection
  • Special counsel calls for strict punishment to prevent history repeating
  • Han allegedly revised martial law proclamation to enhance its legitimacy
  • Former PM faces multiple charges including perjury and abetting insurrection
2 min read

South Korea: Special counsel demands 15-year prison term for ex-PM Han in martial law case

Special counsel seeks 15-year sentence for former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo over martial law imposition, calling it "terror on democracy" with verdict expected January 2025.

"This case was an act of terror on the democracy of the Republic of Korea, and the nation and the people as a whole were the victims - Special Counsel Team Member"

Seoul, Nov 26

A special counsel team in South Korea on Wednesday demanded a 15-year prison term for former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo on charges of abetting former President Yoon Suk Yeol's imposition of martial law.

Special counsel Cho Eun-suk's team made the request during the final hearing of Han's trial at the Seoul Central District Court, making him the first of dozens of defendants in the martial law case to receive a sentencing recommendation, Yonhap News Agency reported.

"Though the defendant was, in fact, the only person who could have stopped the insurrection situation of this case, he abandoned his duty as a servant of the entire nation and took part in the insurrection crime through a series of acts before and after the declaration of martial law," a member of the special counsel team said.

Han has been indicted on charges of abetting the ringleader of an insurrection, playing a key role in an insurrection and perjury, all in connection with the martial law imposition.

In addition to attending a Cabinet meeting shortly before Yoon declared martial law on December 3, he allegedly revised the proclamation afterwards to enhance its legitimacy, discarded it and lied under oath at the Constitutional Court.

The special counsel team asked the court to consider the immense damage to the nation and the people, and his uncooperative attitude in the investigation process.

"This case was an act of terror on the democracy of the Republic of Korea, and the nation and the people as a whole were the victims," the team member said.

"By strictly punishing the defendant, we must ensure this unfortunate history of the Republic of Korea does not repeat itself," he added.

Han is expected to be the first to receive a verdict in the martial law case as the court previously stated plans to deliver its ruling on January 21 or 28 next year.

int/akl/sd

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
15 years seems appropriate for betraying public trust. In our country too, we need stricter punishments for politicians who undermine democracy. No one should be above the law!
A
Arjun K
Interesting to see South Korea taking such strong action. Meanwhile in many countries, powerful politicians get away with much worse. Respect to their judicial system for holding leaders accountable 👏
S
Sarah B
As someone who has lived through Emergency in India, I know how dangerous martial law can be. Good to see accountability, but hope the punishment fits the crime and isn't politically motivated.
V
Vikram M
The fact that he revised the proclamation afterwards shows clear intent. This wasn't just following orders - it was active participation in undermining democracy. Deserves every year of that sentence.
M
Michael C
While I support accountability, I hope this isn't just political revenge. The justice system should be impartial and fair. Let's see what the court actually decides in January.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50