Key Points

The South Korean National Assembly passed a contentious broadcasting bill that expands control over public broadcasters. The ruling Democratic Party pushed through the legislation despite opposition from the People Power Party. This is one of three broadcasting bills that would alter governance structures of KBS, MBC, and EBS. The opposition party boycotted the vote and launched filibusters to block the controversial measures.

Key Points: South Korea National Assembly Passes Controversial Broadcasting Bill

  • Bill expands Foundation for Broadcast Culture board from 9 to 13 members
  • Opposition PPP launched filibuster to block controversial legislation
  • Legislation aims to reduce government influence over public broadcasters
  • Ruling DP holds parliamentary majority with 167 out of 298 seats
2 min read

South Korea: National Assembly passes contentious broadcasting bill

Ruling Democratic Party pushes through contentious broadcasting legislation despite opposition boycott, expanding board control over public broadcasters KBS MBC EBS

"PPP lawmakers boycotted the vote in protest of the bill - Parliamentary Session Report"

Seoul, Aug 21

The South Korean National Assembly on Thursday passed one of three controversial broadcasting bills aimed at reducing the government's influence over public broadcasters, with the ruling Democratic Party (DP) railroading the bill despite objection from the main opposition People Power Party (PPP).

During a parliamentary plenary session, the amendment to the Foundation for Broadcast Culture Act passed with 169 lawmakers in favour and one against, out of 171 lawmakers.

PPP lawmakers boycotted the vote in protest of the bill.

The legislation is one of three contentious broadcasting bills pushed by the DP that would eventually alter the governance structure of the three public broadcasters -- KBS, MBC, and EBS -- by significantly increasing the number of their board directors and granting media and broadcasting associations.

Under the bill, the number of board members of the Foundation for Broadcast Culture, a major shareholder of public broadcaster MBC, will be expanded from nine to 13.

The DP and the conservative PPP have clashed over the legislation, with the PPP arguing that the bills will only increase the presence of progressive figures on the boards of public broadcasters.

The bill was automatically shelved when the July extraordinary session ended at midnight on August 5 after the PPP launched a filibuster to block its passage.

At Thursday's session, the DP, which currently holds a parliamentary majority with 167 out of 298 seats, presented the remaining broadcasting bill -- the Korea Educational Broadcasting System Act. The PPP immediately launched another filibuster to prevent the vote, Yonhap news agency reported.

The DP-controlled National Assembly has already passed an amendment to the Broadcasting Act, the first of the three broadcasting bills, earlier this month.

The ruling party plans to propose the so-called yellow envelope bill, which seeks to broaden labor protections, and a revision to the Commercial Act.

A filibuster involves lawmakers holding the floor for extended periods as a way to prevent a parliamentary vote or delay the passage of a bill. Under the National Assembly Act, a filibuster can be stopped after 24 hours if at least three-fifths of all parliament members, or 180 lawmakers, consent to it.

Meanwhile, Choo Mi-ae, a six-term DP lawmaker, was elected to lead the parliamentary legislation and judiciary committee, after her predecessor, Lee Choon-suak, was expelled from the party for triggering public outrage over allegations of stock trading under a borrowed name.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Boycotting votes instead of participating in debate shows poor parliamentary conduct. Opposition should engage constructively rather than just blocking proceedings. Democracy needs healthy discussion from all sides.
A
Aryan P
Increasing board members from 9 to 13 seems excessive. More bureaucracy doesn't always mean better governance. Sometimes smaller boards make quicker, more effective decisions.
S
Sarah B
As someone who lived in Seoul for 2 years, I've seen how politicized their media can get. Hope this brings more balanced coverage rather than just swinging from one extreme to another.
V
Vikram M
The filibuster mechanism seems interesting - 24 hours limit with 3/5th majority consent. Our Indian parliament could learn from some of these procedural innovations to prevent endless disruptions.
N
Nisha Z
Media independence is crucial for any democracy. Hope this move actually reduces government influence rather than just replacing it with different political influences. The proof will be in the actual reporting quality.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50