Key Points

South Korea's National Assembly approved Kim Min-seok as prime minister despite opposition boycotts over allegations about his wealth and family. The ruling Democratic Party pushed through the confirmation unilaterally, dismissing the PPP's objections. The Assembly also passed key revisions to the Commercial Act, addressing shareholder rights. Kim's nomination had faced scrutiny over past convictions and his family's controversies.

Key Points: South Korea Approves PM Kim Min-seok Amid Opposition Boycott

  • Kim Min-seok confirmed as PM in 173-3 vote amid PPP boycott
  • Opposition boycotted over wealth and family allegations
  • DP defends nominee against politically motivated claims
  • Assembly also passes Commercial Act revision on shareholder rights
2 min read

South Korea: National Assembly approves PM nominee Kim Min-seok

South Korea's National Assembly confirms Kim Min-seok as PM despite PPP boycott over wealth and family allegations.

"The DP will push ahead with the confirmation unilaterally even if the PPP disagrees. – Democratic Party"

Seoul, July 3

The South Korean National Assembly on Thursday endorsed President Lee Jae Myung's pick for prime minister, although all lawmakers from the main opposition People Power Party (PPP) boycotted the vote over allegations surrounding his wealth and family.

The Assembly passed the confirmation motion for Kim Min-seok in a 173-3 vote with three invalid ballots during a plenary session. The approval came 29 days after Lee nominated Kim, a four-term lawmaker of the ruling Democratic Party (DP), as Prime Minister.

Only lawmakers of the DP, which currently holds a parliamentary majority, and other minor parties participated in the vote.

In South Korea, the prime minister is the only Cabinet post that requires parliamentary approval.

The DP earlier said it will push ahead with the confirmation unilaterally even if the PPP disagrees, while the PPP has demanded Kim's withdrawal, calling him an unqualified nominee.

At the session, the Assembly also passed a revision of the Commercial Act that would expand the fiduciary duty of corporate board members to all shareholders.

The rival parties had clashed over the rule that would limit the voting rights of the largest shareholder in a company to 3 per cent when an auditor is being selected, but agreed Wednesday to put the bill to a vote after making amendments to the rule.

A revision to the Martial Law Act that bans the entry of the military and police into the National Assembly is also expected to be proposed during the session, Yonhap news agency reported.

Earlier on June 24, Kim Min-seok had undergone two days of confirmation hearings at the National Assembly, as the main opposition party demanded his withdrawal over allegations surrounding his wealth and family.

Since his nomination by President Lee Jae Myung earlier this month, Kim has come under increased scrutiny over his past conviction for accepting illegal political funds, his significant increase in assets over the last five years, his son's college admissions and his own studies at China's Tsinghua University, among other issues.

The main opposition People Power Party had demanded his withdrawal, but the ruling Democratic Party has cast the allegations as politically motivated attacks and defended the nominee.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya M
The wealth allegations sound familiar... politicians everywhere seem to follow the same playbook. But 173-3 vote shows how majority can bulldoze opposition concerns. Hope South Koreans get transparent governance.
A
Amit K
As an Indian who follows East Asian politics, I must say South Korea's system has better checks than ours. Their PM needs parliamentary approval while our cabinet ministers don't face such scrutiny. Food for thought!
S
Sarah B
The Commercial Act revision seems progressive - expanding fiduciary duties to all shareholders could be good for minority investors. Indian SEBI should take note of such corporate governance reforms.
N
Nisha R
Boycotts never solve anything! Opposition should have participated and raised their concerns properly. This reminds me of how our opposition parties sometimes behave - either walk out or create ruckus instead of constructive debate.
V
Vikram P
The Tsinghua University connection is interesting given current geopolitics. With US-China tensions, wonder if his China education will affect South Korea's foreign policy. India faces similar dilemmas with politicians' foreign connections.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50