NewKerala.com

Key Points

A Seoul court is reviewing whether ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol’s arrest should stand amid a probe into his alleged martial law attempt. Yoon skipped hearings, calling the investigation illegal, while prosecutors warn he may tamper with evidence. His lawyers argue detention is unnecessary due to health concerns and no flight risk. The court must rule within 24 hours on whether he remains jailed during trial.

Key Points: Seoul Court Hears Ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol's Arrest Challenge

  • Seoul court weighs legality of Yoon’s arrest in martial law case
  • Ex-president boycotts hearings over special counsel dispute
  • Prosecutors argue detention prevents evidence tampering
  • Yoon claims health issues, no flight risk justify release
2 min read

South Korea: Court begins hearing on legality of ex-President Yoon's arrest

South Korea's court reviews legality of ex-President Yoon's arrest amid martial law probe as he boycotts hearings.

"The investigation by Cho’s team is illegal as it seriously violates the defendant’s rights. - Yoon’s lawyers"

Seoul, July 18

A Seoul court held a hearing Friday on former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's request to challenge his arrest amid a special counsel probe into his botched attempt to impose martial law.

The closed-door hearing at the Seoul Central District Court began at 10:15 am to determine whether his arrest was legal and should remain in place.

Yoon arrived at the court at around 9 am where he was escorted straight into the holding cell in a transport vehicle, avoiding contact with the press, Yonhap news agency reported.

The ousted president filed for the court review Wednesday, less than a week after he was placed under arrest at the Seoul Detention Centre in Uiwang, just south of the capital, over five key charges related to his attempt to impose martial law on December 3.

If the court rules in favor of Yoon, he will be released and stand trial without detention.

The court has to deliver its ruling within 24 hours after the hearing.

Special counsel Cho Eun-suk's team was expected to call for the arrest to remain in place, given the gravity of the charges Yoon faces and the risk of him destroying evidence or attempting to influence witness testimony. It will also likely ask the court to take into account the fact that Yoon has been refusing to cooperate with the investigation.

Yoon has skipped his insurrection trial twice and said he will boycott all future hearings unless Cho's team is removed from the courtroom.

Yoon was expected to argue that his arrest is not necessary since the former president poses no risk of fleeing and his health conditions are worsening.

Yoon's lawyers claim that the investigation by Cho's team is "illegal" as it seriously violates the defendant's rights.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya M
Attempting martial law? That's shocking! In India we've seen what happens during Emergency... no democracy should tolerate such moves. Hope justice prevails.
A
Amit K
Interesting to see how quickly South Korea acts on such serious matters. Meanwhile in India, cases drag on for decades. Our judicial system needs urgent reforms.
S
Sarah B
As an expat in Seoul, I can say this case is all anyone's talking about here. The speed of proceedings is impressive compared to back home in Canada.
N
Nisha R
While due process must be followed, we should be careful not to celebrate too soon. Remember how many Indian politicians get arrested only to be acquitted later?
V
Vikram P
South Korea's handling of this case shows why they're an economic powerhouse - strong institutions matter more than personalities. India needs this mindset!
K
Kavya N
The health condition argument seems like an excuse... if ordinary citizens can face trial while sick, why not ex-presidents? Equality before law should be absolute.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50