Music Royalty Battle: Sony Refuses Ilaiyaraaja Revenue Details in Court

Sony Music has declined to share revenue details with legendary composer Ilaiyaraaja in the Madras High Court. The company cited confidentiality concerns while submitting accounts in a sealed cover. Ilaiyaraaja's legal team argued against this practice, calling for transparency in judicial proceedings. The court has postponed further hearings until the Supreme Court decides on Sony's transfer plea to Bombay High Court.

Key Points: Sony Music Declines Ilaiyaraaja Revenue Details in Madras HC

  • Sony Music submitted accounts in sealed cover citing commercial confidentiality
  • Ilaiyaraaja's counsel opposed sealed cover practice as undermining transparency
  • Madras HC deferred hearing pending Supreme Court transfer plea decision
  • Case involves copyright dispute over songs used on streaming platforms
2 min read

Sony Music declines to share revenue details with Ilaiyaraaja, cites confidentiality in Madras HC

Sony Music refuses to share revenue details with Ilaiyaraaja, citing confidentiality. Legal battle over music copyright continues in Madras High Court.

Sony Music declines to share revenue details with Ilaiyaraaja, cites confidentiality in Madras HC
"Ilaiyaraaja could not seek such data unless he first established his legal right over the songs - Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel for Sony Music"

Chennai, Oct 22

In a significant turn in the ongoing legal tussle between music maestro R. Ilaiyaraaja and Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited, the company on Wednesday refused to furnish the musician with the statement of accounts detailing revenue earned from the commercial use of his compositions.

The issue came up for hearing before Justice N. Senthilkumar of the Madras High Court.

Appearing for Sony Music, senior counsel Vijay Narayan said that while his client had produced the statement of accounts in a sealed cover for the judge’s perusal, it could not be shared with Ilaiyaraaja or his counsel as the document contained confidential commercial information, including revenue from platforms such as Apple Music, Amazon Music, and Spotify. He contended that Ilaiyaraaja could not seek such data unless he first established his legal right over the songs in question, which were composed for films for which he had already received remuneration from the producers.

Opposing this argument, senior counsel S. Prabakaran, representing Ilaiyaraaja, said that the Supreme Court had repeatedly disapproved of the practice of submitting documents in sealed covers. He urged the court to direct Sony Music to disclose the details openly, asserting that withholding such information undermined transparency in judicial proceedings.

Justice Senthilkumar, however, decided against opening the sealed cover at this stage. The judge was informed that Sony Music had already approached the Supreme Court seeking to transfer Ilaiyaraaja’s suit from the Madras High Court to the Bombay High Court, where the company had filed a related civil suit in 2021 to declare itself the rightful copyright holder of certain songs composed by the veteran musician. That case also sought to restrain Ilaiyaraaja from asserting commercial rights over those works.

Vijay Narayan further informed the court that the Supreme Court Bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran had issued notice to Ilaiyaraaja on October 15, 2025, and was expected to hear the transfer plea on November 26. Considering this, Justice Senthilkumar observed that High Courts generally refrain from proceeding with cases pending transfer before the apex court.

Accordingly, the judge directed the registry to list Ilaiyaraaja’s case for further hearing on November 27, 2025, after the Supreme Court’s decision on the transfer plea. The statement of accounts submitted by Sony Music will remain unopened until then.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh Q
As someone working in the music industry, I understand Sony's position about confidential business data. But artists deserve to know how their work is performing. There should be a balanced approach.
A
Arjun K
Ilaiyaraaja's music has been the soundtrack of our lives! From "Raja Raja Cholan" to "Mouna Ragam," his compositions are priceless. Companies shouldn't exploit legendary artists like this. Justice must prevail! 🙏
M
Michael C
The sealed cover practice really needs reform. Transparency in court proceedings is essential for justice. Hope the Supreme Court takes the right decision on this matter.
S
Shreya B
This case highlights why we need stronger copyright laws in India. Our artists deserve better protection. Ilaiyaraaja sir has been fighting for artists' rights for decades - respect! 💪
K
Karthik V
While I support Ilaiyaraaja, let's be fair - if he was paid by film producers for the compositions, the legal rights might be complex. The courts will need to examine the original contracts carefully.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50