NewKerala.com

Sonam Wangchuk NSA Hearing: 3-Hour Jail Review Amid Legal Battle

The Advisory Board spent three hours reviewing Sonam Wangchuk's detention under the National Security Act. His wife was present during the confidential proceedings at Jodhpur Central Jail. The board examined both the administration's justification and Wangchuk's challenge to his detention. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is also considering petitions against what many call an arbitrary detention.

Key Points: Sonam Wangchuk NSA Case Advisory Board Jodhpur Jail Hearing

  • Three-member panel conducted confidential hearing at Jodhpur Central Jail for three hours
  • Wangchuk's wife Geetanjali Angmo attended the closed-door proceedings
  • Board reviewing administration's NSA justification and detention challenges
  • Supreme Court simultaneously hearing petitions against Wangchuk's controversial detention
2 min read

Sonam Wangchuk case: Advisory Board holds 3-hour discussion in Jodhpur Jail, wife present

Advisory Board holds 3-hour NSA detention review for environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk at Jodhpur Jail as Supreme Court considers petitions against his detention.

"Wangchuk's statements and videos were distorted and presented out of context - Geetanjali Angmo"

Jaipur, Oct 24

The members of the Advisory Board on Friday held a three-hour hearing at Jodhpur Central Jail in Rajasthan to review the detention of environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk under the National Security Act (NSA).

The three-member panel arrived at the jail around 10:30 a.m. from the Jodhpur Circuit House to record Wangchuk’s statements and review documents related to the case. Wangchuk’s wife, Geetanjali Angmo, was also present during the proceedings.

The hearing was conducted by Advisory Board Chairman and former judge M.K. Hujura, District Judge Manoj Parihar and social activist Spal Jayesh Angmo.

The Advisory Board is a special constitutional body constituted under the National Security Act (NSA) 1980, which reviews cases of preventive detention

The closed-door session reportedly focused on the reasons cited by the administration for invoking the NSA and Wangchuk’s representation challenging the same.

Sonam Wangchuk, a well-known innovator and environmentalist from Ladakh, was detained under the National Security Act (NSA) earlier this year. The move triggered nationwide protests and legal challenges, with several rights groups calling the detention arbitrary.

The Supreme Court is also hearing petitions against the government’s action.

Wangchuk’s wife, Geetanjali Angmo, stated that their legal team has challenged both the grounds of detention and the procedural lapses in the case. She alleged that Wangchuk’s statements and videos were distorted and presented out of context, forming a misleading basis for the NSA order.

It determines whether the detention has adequate justification. The board comprises three members, all of whom are sitting or former High Court judges, appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court of the respective state.

The government must submit all relevant documents to the board within three weeks of detention, and the board must send its report within seven weeks.

Proceedings remain confidential, and detainees are heard in person without the presence of lawyers. The board’s recommendations will determine whether Wangchuk’s detention under the NSA continues or is revoked, said officials.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The fact that detainees are heard without lawyers present is problematic. Everyone deserves proper legal representation, especially in national security cases.
A
Arjun K
National security is paramount, but we must ensure laws aren't misused against genuine activists. Wangchuk's work in education innovation is internationally recognized. The government should be more transparent about the charges.
P
Priya S
If his statements were distorted as claimed by his wife, that's very serious. We need to trust our institutions but also ensure they function fairly. The advisory board's decision will be crucial.
M
Michael C
While I support strong national security measures, I'm uncomfortable with how quickly NSA is being invoked lately. There should be clearer guidelines to prevent potential misuse against legitimate dissent.
K
Kavya N
As someone from the education field, I know how much Wangchuk has contributed to innovative learning. His detention has shocked many in the academic community. Hope the board makes the right call! 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50