NewKerala.com

West Bengal Voter List Mystery: Why DMs Lose Control Over Observers

The Election Commission has made a significant change in West Bengal's voter list revision process. District Magistrates will no longer control the micro-observers overseeing public hearings. Instead, these observers will answer directly to the state's Chief Electoral Officer and special observers appointed by the ECI. This move aims to ensure greater impartiality in the crucial pre-election exercise.

Key Points: ECI Bars Bengal DMs From Controlling Voter List Micro-Observers

  • Micro-observers will report directly to the state CEO and special roll observers
  • DMs retain only logistical and security support duties for the observers
  • Around 3000 observers, central govt employees, to be deployed for hearings
  • Hearings on claims to start Dec 27, final list to be published Feb 14
2 min read

SIR exercise in Bengal: DMs not to control micro-observers for voter list hearings

In a major shift, Election Commission removes Bengal DMs as controlling authority for 3000 micro-observers overseeing voter list hearings. Details inside.

"The micro-observers will neither be answerable to the DMs or DEOs nor bound by any instructions issued by them. - Sources in CEO's office"

Kolkata, Dec 20

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has made it clear that district magistrates (DMs), who also function as district electoral officers (DEOs), will not be the controlling authorities of the micro-observers to be appointed for supervising hearing sessions on claims and objections to the draft voters’ list in West Bengal, scheduled to begin next week.

This means the micro-observers will neither be answerable to the DMs or DEOs nor bound by any instructions issued by them.

As per the Commission's guidelines, the micro-observers will report only to the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, and the special roll observers appointed by the ECI to review the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in the state, sources in the CEO’s office said.

They added that the micro-observers will function under the direct supervision of the special roll observers, who are either serving or retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers.

However, the CEO's office clarified that DMs and DEOs will be responsible for providing logistical support to the micro-observers and ensuring their security during operations in the respective districts.

The hearing sessions in the second stage of the three-stage SIR exercise are likely to commence from December 27. The draft voters' list was published on December 16.

Around 3,000 micro-observers will be appointed for the hearing sessions, with the aim of deploying one micro-observer at each hearing table.

As decided by the Commission, Central government employees or employees of Central public sector undertakings or public sector banks at Group-B level or above will be appointed as micro-observers.

The hearings on claims and objections will be conducted only at the offices of the DMs or DEOs. The SIR exercise in West Bengal began on November 4 and will conclude with the publication of the final voters’ list on February 14 next year. Thereafter, the ECI will announce the polling and counting dates for the Assembly elections.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul R
Good move on paper. But practically, will it work? The DMs are still responsible for logistics and security. That gives them indirect influence. The real test will be on the ground.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the centralization of reporting to the CEO and special observers. Using central govt employees as micro-observers should, in theory, reduce local bias. The logistical challenge with 3000 observers will be huge though.
A
Aman W
Finally! This is what we need before elections. Too many complaints about bogus voters in the past. If the observers are truly independent, the final list will be more accurate. Jai Hind!
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, while the intent is good, this creates a very complex chain of command. Micro-observers report to special observers, who report to the CEO... but the DM handles their safety and logistics on site. Could lead to confusion and delays in decision-making during hearings.
M
Meera T
The devil is in the details. Who selects these 3000 central government employees? What's the mechanism to ensure they themselves are impartial? The process must be open to public scrutiny.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50