Key Points

The Supreme Court has scheduled November 12 for hearing Uddhav Thackeray's challenge against the Election Commission's decision. The EC had awarded the Shiv Sena name and its iconic bow-and-arrow symbol to the Eknath Shinde-led faction. Uddhav's lawyer Kapil Sibal sought urgent consideration citing upcoming local polls in Maharashtra. The court also addressed a separate plea challenging the Assembly Speaker's decision not to disqualify Shinde's MLAs.

Key Points: Supreme Court Sets November 12 for Uddhav Thackeray Shiv Sena Symbol Plea

  • Supreme Court schedules November 12 hearing for Uddhav's symbol dispute plea
  • Urgent hearing sought due to Maharashtra local polls in January 2026
  • Case challenges EC decision granting Shiv Sena symbol to Shinde faction
  • Separate plea pending on disqualification of 16 Shinde camp MLAs
3 min read

Shiv Sena symbol row: SC to hear Uddhav Thackeray's plea on November 12

Supreme Court fixes November 12 hearing for Uddhav Thackeray's challenge against Election Commission awarding Shiv Sena name and bow-arrow symbol to Eknath Shinde faction.

"We will hear all the parties on November 12, and if need arises, we can continue the hearing on November 13 - Supreme Court Bench"

New Delhi, Oct 7

The Supreme Court on Wednesday fixed November 12 for hearing the plea filed by Uddhav Thackeray against the order of the Election Commission of India (ECI) that had allotted party name 'Shiv Sena' and its iconic election symbol 'Bow and Arrow' to the Eknath Shinde-led faction.

A Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and N. Kotiswar Singh agreed to fix the matter for hearing next month after senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Uddhav Thackeray, submitted that the matter required urgent consideration as local polls in Maharashtra are scheduled for January 2026.

“We will hear all the parties on November 12, and if need arises, we can continue the hearing on November 13,” the apex court said.

Sibal also sought an urgent hearing on another plea filed by the Shiv Sena(UBT) faction. The plea challenged the ruling of the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker, who declined to disqualify 16 MLAs from the ruling camp, including then Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, holding that the Shinde group constituted the real "Shiv Sena" as it commanded a majority in both the legislature and the party’s National Executive.

To this, the Justice Kant-led Bench remarked that Sibal should obtain the permission of the Chief Justice of India (CJI), who is the master of the roster, for a joint hearing since the other petition is pending before a different Bench.

Earlier in March 2023, the apex court had refused to stay the ECI decision recognising the Eknath Shinde faction as the official Shiv Sena and granting it the party name and symbol. However, it agreed to entertain a plea by Uddhav Thackeray challenging the decision.

"We cannot pass an order to stay the Election Commission order. We are entertaining the SLP (special leave petition by Thackeray against the EC order). We cannot stay the EC order today," remarked a bench headed by then Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud.

Thackeray, in his plea filed before the apex court, contended that the poll body has failed to appreciate that he enjoys overwhelming support in the rank and file of the party.

Further, the plea alleged that the ECI has failed to discharge its duties as a neutral arbiter of disputes under para 15 of the Symbols Order and has acted in a manner undermining its constitutional status.

In response, the poll body in its counter-affidavit has told the top court that it has passed a "well-reasoned" order, in a quasi-judicial capacity, allotting the name and party symbol of the Shiv Sena to the Shinde faction.

"Since the impugned order was passed not in an administrative capacity of the commission but in a quasi-judicial capacity under Paragraph 15 of the Symbols Order, it has no contentions to make on the merits of the case as the impugned order is a well-reasoned order and covers all the issues raised by the petitioner," the ECI said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
ECI should have been more careful while handling this sensitive matter. Political symbols carry emotional value for voters, especially in Maharashtra. The delay in hearing is concerning with local polls approaching.
M
Michael C
As an observer of Indian politics, this case highlights the importance of party symbols in your democratic process. The legal battle shows how institutional mechanisms are being tested. Interesting to see how SC balances tradition with constitutional principles.
A
Aditya G
Honestly, both factions should have worked out their differences internally. Now common Shiv Sainiks are confused about who represents the real party ideology. Political defections have become too common these days 😔
S
Sarah B
The Supreme Court's approach seems balanced - not staying the EC order but agreeing to hear the petition. This maintains stability while ensuring justice is served. November 12 hearing will be crucial for Maharashtra's political landscape.
K
Kavya N
Whatever the court decides, I hope it sets a clear precedent for future political disputes. The focus should be on serving the people of Maharashtra, not just fighting over symbols and names. Development should be the priority! 💪

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50