Shimla Mosque Demolition Order: Court Upholds Ruling Amid Widespread Protests

A Shimla court has upheld the decision to demolish the Sanjauli mosque after declaring it an illegal structure. The court rejected appeals from both the Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board and the Mosque Committee against the demolition order. The mosque was rebuilt without obtaining necessary permissions from the municipal corporation. The legal battle continues as the Mosque Committee plans to challenge this decision in the high court.

Key Points: Shimla Court Orders Sanjauli Mosque Demolition as Illegal Structure

  • Court rejects appeals from Waqf Board and Mosque Committee against demolition order
  • Mosque declared illegal due to lack of municipal permissions and plans
  • Structure originally existed before 1947 but rebuilt without authorization
  • Previous communal clashes occurred after people took shelter in mosque
2 min read

Shimla court orders demolition of mosque amid protests

Shimla court upholds demolition order for Sanjauli mosque declared illegal, rejecting Waqf Board appeal amid ongoing legal battles and community protests.

"Now the entire mosque will be demolished - Jagat Pal, Advocate"

Shimla, Oct 30

A court in Shimla on Thursday upheld the decision of Court of the Municipal Commissioner to demolish the mosque in Sanjauli, located on the outskirts of the Himachal Pradesh capital, as it was illegal and saw widespread protests.

Rejecting the appeal for Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board and the Sanjauli Mosque Committee, Additional District and Sessions Judge Yajuvinder Singh directed to demolish all the floors of the mosque, which was declared illegal.

On May 3, the Commissioner's Court had directed the Waqf Board and the Mosque Committee to demolish the mosque after declaring it illegal.

After the court's order, both the Waqf Board and the Mosque Committee had challenged the decision in Shimla district court.

However, the Sanjauli Mosque Committee said it would challenge the district court decision in the high court.

Jagat Pal, advocate for the petitioners, said the Waqf Board and the Mosque Committee had filed two appeals in the district court.

However, the both appeals were dismissed by the district court.

"Now the entire mosque will be demolished," Pal told the media.

Earlier, the Court of the Municipal Commissioner had ordered the demolition of two additional floors of the mosque.

A similar order was issued last year for the demolition of its three floors.

Counsel for Waqf Board's said that the mosque originally existed before 1947 and was rebuilt after being demolished.

However, Commissioner Bhupender Kumar Attri had asked why the necessary permissions, including architectural plans, were not obtained from the municipal corporation for its reconstruction.

The Waqf Board had also failed to present the mosque's revenue records during the court hearing.

The Himachal Pradesh High Court had directed the Municipal Commissioner to decide the case by May 8.

The Commissioner's Court passed the order after hearing both parties.

A communal clash flared in September last year after some members of a community had taken shelter in the mosque.

Local residents led by Hindu organisations had demanded the demolition of what they claim is an unauthorised mosque structure and the registration of outsiders coming to the state.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is very sad. Places of worship should be respected. The Waqf Board should have followed proper procedures though. Hope the high court finds a peaceful solution. 🙏
A
Arjun K
Why didn't they get proper permissions? Everyone has to follow building laws. This sets a dangerous precedent if we allow illegal constructions based on sentiment.
S
Sarah B
As someone living in Shimla, I hope this doesn't lead to more tensions. The communal clash last year was scary enough. We need peace in our beautiful hills. 🏔️
V
Vikram M
The authorities should have been more proactive in guiding them about proper procedures. Now it's become a bigger issue. Better urban planning is needed in hill stations.
M
Michael C
While I respect the court's decision, I hope alternative arrangements are made for worshippers. Religious sentiments matter, but so does the rule of law.
K
Kavya N
The historical claim of pre-1947 existence should have been properly documented. Without proper records, it's difficult for courts to make exceptions. Documentation is key! 📄

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50