Key Points

Student activist Sharjeel Imam has withdrawn his interim bail application from a Delhi court to contest the Bihar Assembly elections. The move comes as his bail plea remains pending before the Supreme Court, which is reviewing cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy. Imam was seeking permission to contest from the Bahadurganj constituency as an Independent candidate. The Delhi High Court had previously noted potential involvement in inflammatory speeches during the riots.

Key Points: Sharjeel Imam Drops Bihar Election Bail Plea in Delhi Court

  • Imam seeks bail to contest Bahadurganj constituency as Independent candidate
  • Supreme Court currently reviewing bail pleas of student activists
  • Election Commission schedules Bihar polls in two phases on Nov 6 and 11
  • Imam accused under UAPA in 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case
2 min read

Sharjeel Imam withdraws plea from Delhi court seeking interim bail to contest Bihar elections

Accused in Delhi riots case, Sharjeel Imam withdraws interim bail application for Bihar Assembly elections amid ongoing legal battle

"The alleged inflammatory and provocative speeches... prima facie indicate their role in the alleged conspiracy - Delhi High Court Order"

New Delhi, Oct 14

Sharjeel Imam, accused under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in the 2020 Delhi riots "larger conspiracy case", on Tuesday withdrew his application filed before a Delhi court seeking interim bail to contest the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections.

Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Sameer Bajpai of the Karkardooma Courts said the application could be withdrawn after Imam's counsel pointed out that the Supreme Court would be the right forum to seek interim bail as the regular bail plea remains pending there.

In his application, Sharjeel Imam has sought interim bail from October 15 to October 29 to contest as an Independent candidate from the Bahadurganj constituency in Kishanganj district.

The Supreme Court is already seized of the bail pleas of Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, Meeran Haider, and Gulfisha Fatima, and has sought a response from the Delhi Police.

The student activists have been languishing in jail for the last five years.

Earlier, the Delhi High Court had denied bail to several leaders in connection with the alleged larger conspiracy behind the Delhi riots. In its order passed on September 2, a Bench of Justices Shalinder Kaur and Navin Chawla had delivered inflammatory speeches on February 24, 2020, coinciding with the then US President Donald Trump's state visit, which the prosecution alleged was deliberately timed to trigger riots on February 23-24 and draw international attention.

"The alleged inflammatory and provocative speeches delivered by the appellants, when considered in totality, prima facie indicate their role in the alleged conspiracy," the Delhi High Court said.

The ECI has announced that the Bihar Assembly elections will be held in two phases, on November 6 and 11, with the counting of votes scheduled for November 14. Bahadurganj will go to the polls on November 11.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Five years in jail without conviction? That's too long for anyone. Our justice system needs reform. Even if the charges are serious, everyone deserves a speedy trial. This delay affects families too. 😔
S
Sarah B
Interesting timing to withdraw the plea. Maybe they realized it wouldn't stand legal scrutiny. The Supreme Court is the right forum for such matters. Let's trust our judiciary to handle this fairly.
A
Arjun K
Delhi riots were a dark chapter for our capital. If courts have found evidence of conspiracy, then the accused should face trial properly. Elections can wait - justice cannot. 🙏
M
Michael C
As an observer, I find it concerning when political ambitions intersect with serious criminal cases. The withdrawal suggests the legal team recognized the weakness of their position. Due process must prevail.
K
Kavya N
While I respect our legal system, I worry about the prolonged detention. Many countries have time limits for pre-trial detention. We should learn from international best practices while maintaining our sovereignty.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50