NewKerala.com

UK MP Condemns Hong Kong Trial: Why Jimmy Lai's Conviction Sparks Outrage

British MP Priti Patel has strongly criticized the conviction of pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong. She labeled the legal proceedings a "shameful show trial" conducted under Beijing's national security law. Patel called for concrete action from the UK government, including potentially canceling high-level diplomatic visits. She emphasized that Lai's case represents a critical test for UK-China relations and fundamental freedoms.

Key Points: Priti Patel Slams Jimmy Lai Hong Kong Conviction as Show Trial

  • Former UK Home Secretary Priti Patel condemns the trial as a violation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration
  • Patel describes disturbing scenes of the 78-year-old Lai being paraded in chains during proceedings
  • She demands the UK government cancel the PM's China visit to secure Lai's immediate release
  • The case raises significant issues for UK-China relations and foreign policy priorities
3 min read

'Shameful show trial': UK MP Priti Patel condemns Hong Kong journalist Jimmy Lai's conviction

UK MP Priti Patel condemns the conviction of British citizen Jimmy Lai under Hong Kong's security law, calling it a "shameful show trial" and demanding his release.

"Jimmy Lai's imprisonment, trial and conviction mark a new low in the Chinese Communist Party's shameful attempts to extinguish freedom, democracy and the rule of law in Hong Kong. - Priti Patel"

London, Dec 16

UK Conservative Party MP Priti Patel condemned the conviction of British citizen and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai, describing the proceedings as a "shameful show trial" conducted under the repressive national security law imposed by Beijing on Hong Kong in breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration.

Jimmy Lai, a former Hong Kong media tycoon and founder of the now-shuttered Apple Daily newspaper, was convicted under the national security law, a move that has drawn widespread international criticism from press freedom groups and Western governments.

Speaking at the House of Commons, Patel said, "Jimmy Lai's imprisonment, trial and conviction mark a new low in the Chinese Communist Party's shameful attempts to extinguish freedom, democracy and the rule of law in Hong Kong. They are yet more serious violations of the Sino-British Joint Declaration. The scenes of Jimmy, a 78-year-old man, being paraded around in chains are disturbing, but his defiance stands as a source of hope for those who still believe in freedom, democracy and human rights."

Assuring that all the members of the Parliament stand firmly with Jimmy's family in their fight for his release continues, Patel said he should be freed and allowed to come home to the United Kingdom to be with his family.

"Despite all the pain and suffering, despite being persecuted at the hands of the Chinese Communist Party, despite being held in solitary confinement for more than 1,800 days, and despite his health deteriorating, Jimmy's spirit remains unbroken. Throughout the last few years, his son Sebastien, his family and supporters have fought hard for his freedom and to raise awareness of his appalling treatment. I pay tribute to them," she added.

She demanded action from the UK Government to secure Jimmy's release and to significantly ratchet up the pressure to end the "disgraceful and draconian" national security law, and asked what consequences Beijing would face if it did not change its position.

Patel stressed that the immediate release of Jimmy Lai must be a priority for the Keir Starmer Government, adding that the case raises wider issues with UK-China relations.

"With the Chinese Communist party continuing to imprison Jimmy Lai and undermine freedom in Hong Kong, will the Foreign Secretary and the Prime Minister send a signal of our disgust to the CCP by cancelling the Prime Minister's planned visit to China next January unless Jimmy Lai is released, blocking China's super-embassy planning application and placing it on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme?" she asked.

scor/sd/

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
It's good to see a strong stance from the UK. China's actions in Hong Kong are a clear violation of the "one country, two systems" promise. As Indians, we understand the importance of sovereignty, but also of honoring international agreements. This sets a dangerous precedent.
A
Aman W
The UK has a moral duty here. Jimmy Lai is a British citizen. But let's be real – will economic interests with China allow for any real "consequences"? The West often talks tough but acts soft when money is involved. 🤷‍♂️
S
Sarah B
As someone living in India, this hits close to home. We cherish our democratic freedoms. Seeing a 78-year-old man paraded in chains is indeed disturbing, no matter what the charges are. The principle of a fair trial is universal.
V
Vikram M
China's national security law is a tool for suppression, plain and simple. India must watch this closely, especially regarding our own borders and China's expansionist behavior. Global democratic nations need to stand together.
K
Karthik V
Priti Patel is right to speak up, but where was this outrage when the UK itself was compromising values for trade deals? There's some hypocrisy here. Still, the cause is just. Freedom of speech should be defended everywhere.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50