SEBI proposes direct arbitration for high-value and repetitive complaints

IANS April 21, 2025 304 views

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has proposed changes to improve the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) system in the securities market. The new mechanism suggests direct arbitration for claims over Rs 10 crore and repetitive issues, bypassing initial conciliation. SEBI's plan includes electronic conciliation acceptance, annual evaluations of dispute resolution professionals, and a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for handling complaints. Public feedback on these proposals is invited until May 12, aiming to make the dispute resolution process more efficient and transparent.

"This document will be made available online and reviewed every year to keep it updated." - SEBI
SEBI proposes direct arbitration for high-value and repetitive complaints
Mumbai, April 21: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on Monday proposed a new mechanism to directly send certain disputes for arbitration instead of first going through conciliation.

Key Points

1

SEBI targets faster resolution for Rs 10 crore-plus claims

2

Proposals include a legally-binding electronic conciliation

3

Annual evaluation for arbitrators and conciliators

4

SOP to guide ODR process jointly by MIIs and ODR institutions

This change is part of SEBI's broader plan to improve the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) system in the Indian securities market and make it more efficient.

According to SEBI's consultation paper, complaints involving financial claims of Rs 10 crore or more, and those that are chronic or repetitive in nature, should go straight to arbitration.

This will help in resolving long-pending and complex disputes faster. SEBI has invited public comments on these proposals until May 12.

Other cases that may be directly referred for arbitration include those filed by specific institutions, recovery claims made by trading members, cases where both parties agree to arbitration, and legal or time-barred issues identified early in the process.

However, if a party chooses not to go for arbitration, the case will be closed in the ODR portal. The party can still pursue it through other legal channels outside the ODR system.

The capital markets regulator also suggested that settlements reached through conciliation should be accepted electronically and be legally binding.

In addition, it has proposed that ODR institutions must maintain separate panels for conciliators and arbitrators, ensuring that one person does not serve in both roles.

These professionals would be evaluated annually to maintain the quality of dispute resolution.

As part of streamlining the process, SEBI has also proposed that all market infrastructure institutions (MIIs) and ODR institutions should jointly prepare a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the ODR system.

This SOP would provide step-by-step guidance on lodging complaints, the required documents, handling repetitive or invalid complaints, and the responsibilities of each party during different stages like pre-conciliation, conciliation, and arbitration.

The SOP will also include rules for recording proceedings, payment of fees, enforcement of arbitration awards, and the actions to be taken against participants who break the rules.

"This document will be made available online and reviewed every year to keep it updated," the market regulator said.

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Finally some good news for investors! The current system takes forever to resolve disputes. Direct arbitration for high-value cases makes perfect sense. Hope they implement this soon 🤞
P
Priya M.
I appreciate the annual evaluation of arbitrators - quality control is crucial. But will there be transparency in how these evaluations are conducted? The public should know the criteria.
A
Amit S.
₹10 crore threshold seems high. What about smaller investors with legitimate complaints? The system shouldn't create two classes of investors based on claim amounts.
N
Neha T.
The SOP part is most promising! Standardized processes will help reduce confusion and make the system more accessible to regular investors like me who aren't legal experts.
V
Vikram J.
As someone who's been through SEBI's dispute process before - this is a massive improvement. The separate panels for conciliators/arbitrators is smart - prevents conflicts of interest.
S
Sanjay P.
Electronic settlements are overdue! But hope they implement strong cybersecurity measures too. Last thing we need is digital fraud in arbitration processes.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags:
You May Like!