Supreme Court Shocked: Maharashtra's 4-Year Delay in Framing Charges

The Supreme Court expressed shock that an accused person has been in jail for over four years without charges being framed. Despite the charge sheet being filed in early 2022, the trial hasn't progressed to the charging stage. The court found the state government's explanation about absent co-accused unacceptable and ordered both police and trial court to submit reports. This marks the second recent instance where the Supreme Court has raised concerns about Maharashtra's criminal trial delays.

Key Points: SC Shocked Over Maharashtra Court Delay Framing Charges

  • Accused jailed for over four years without charges being framed
  • Charge sheet filed in January 2022 but trial stalled
  • Court suspects collusion between prosecution and accused
  • Maharashtra government blamed delay on absent co-accused
3 min read

SC 'shocked' over Maha court not framing charges against man for 4 years; seeks report from police, trial court

Supreme Court expresses shock as accused remains jailed for 4 years without charges framed. Court orders police and trial court to submit reports within 3 weeks.

"This is really shocking - Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah"

New Delhi, Nov 13

The Supreme Court has expressed “shock” over the continued incarceration of an accused in Maharashtra for more than four years without charges being framed, despite a charge sheet having been filed in early 2022.

A Bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Prashant Kumar Mishra said it was “really shocking” that the petitioner remains behind bars while the trial has not even reached the stage of framing charges.

“Even after four years of the petitioner being behind bars, charges have not yet been framed despite the charge sheet having been submitted on 13.01.2022. This is really shocking,” the Justice Amanullah-led Bench observed.

When the apex court sought an explanation, the counsel for the Maharashtra government claimed that the delay was due to other co-accused not appearing. However, the Justice Amanullah-led Bench found this justification unacceptable.

“We are more shocked at the said stand taken by learned counsel for the respondent-State. It transpires that the prosecution has not filed any application for cancellation of bail of the other co-accused, who are out on bail and who are blamed to be the reason why even charges could not be framed,” the apex court said.

“Tentatively, we feel that there is collusion between the prosecution and the accused,” it added.

The Justice Amanullah-led Bench directed the Superintendent of Police concerned to file an explanation on why such a situation had arisen and why no steps were taken to ensure the trial’s progress. It also ordered the trial court to submit a report explaining its failure to secure the attendance of co-accused who are out on bail. Both reports are to be submitted within three weeks.

The matter will next be heard on December 2, with the apex court warning that “if the explanations are not satisfactory, the Court may take a strict view in the matter”.

This is the second time in recent weeks that the Supreme Court has expressed alarm at the state of criminal trials in Maharashtra.

In early October this year, a Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh had described as “a very shocking state of affairs” the fact that hundreds of cases across the state had been pending for framing of charges for over a decade -- some since 2006. In that matter too, the top court had directed the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court to submit detailed reports on steps taken to ensure the timely framing of charges and production of undertrial prisoners.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Finally the Supreme Court is taking notice of these delays. Our judicial system is overburdened and needs more judges and infrastructure. Hope this case brings positive changes.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in legal aid, I see this daily. The "collusion between prosecution and accused" observation by SC is very serious. This needs thorough investigation.
A
Arjun K
While I support judicial reforms, let's not forget that the accused might be dangerous. The system should be fair but also ensure public safety. Hope the truth comes out soon.
N
Nikhil C
This is why common people lose faith in the system. Four years without trial? Justice delayed is justice denied. Maharashtra government should be held accountable.
M
Michael C
Respectfully, while the delay is concerning, we should trust our judiciary. The Supreme Court's intervention shows the system has checks and balances. Let's wait for the reports.
K
Kavya N
This case highlights the urgent need for prison reforms too. Imagine being in jail for years without even knowing what charges you're facing! 😔 Hope the December 2 hearing brings justice.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50