Key Points

The Supreme Court has requested an explanation from the Jharkhand High Court regarding the rejection of a child care leave request by Additional District Judge Kashika M. Prasad. Prasad, a single parent and recent transferee, emphasized the challenge in childcare management which necessitated the leave. Her request was denied without any provided reasons, prompting her to seek immediate redress from the apex court. The Supreme Court has ensured that the matter will be settled promptly, having communicated its order to the Jharkhand High Court.

Key Points: Supreme Court Seeks Jharkhand HC Reply on ADJ Prasad's Leave Denial

  • SC seeks response from Jharkhand HC on ADJ Prasad's leave denial
  • ADJ Prasad, a single parent, faced leave rejection without reasons
  • SC to conclusively hear matter post communication with Jharkhand HC
  • High Court rules didn’t classify her case as urgent, delaying hearing
2 min read

SC seeks Jharkhand HC's response on rejection of child care leave for woman ADJ

Supreme Court demands Jharkhand HC response in ADJ Prasad's child care leave case ruling.

"Her ACRs reflect professional excellence. - Counsel for Prasad"

New Delhi, May 29

The Supreme Court on Thursday sought a response from the Jharkhand High Court within a week on rejection of a child care leave application filed by Additional District Judge (ADJ) Kashika M. Prasad, who is posted in the state.

The direction came from a bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice A.G. Masih while hearing a petition filed by Prasad, who challenged the refusal to grant her child care leave.

The apex court instructed that its order be communicated to the Jharkhand High Court via email and made it clear that the matter would be conclusively heard on the next date of listing.

“All the parties are informed that we will settle the matter on the next date,” the court stated in its order.

During the hearing, the counsel appearing for the petitioner informed the court that Prasad is a single parent and has maintained an exemplary service record. Her Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs), he said, reflect her professional excellence.

The petition noted that Prasad had sought leave from June 10 under the Jharkhand High Court’s child care leave policy, which allows for up to 730 days of such leave. However, her application was rejected without assigning any reasons.

The bench asked why the petitioner had not first approached the Jharkhand High Court for judicial relief before knocking on the doors of the apex court.

In response, her counsel explained that while immediate relief was needed, the High Court’s rules did not classify the matter as ‘urgent’. As a result, any listing would have only happened after the summer recess.

ADJ Prasad was earlier posted in the Hazaribagh District Court and has recently been transferred. Her advocate argued that due to the recent transfer and her responsibilities as a single parent, managing childcare had become challenging -- prompting the leave request.

After the petition was filed and mentioned for urgent hearing, the Supreme Court agreed to take up the matter but questioned the grounds on which the leave had been denied.

The counsel submitted that no reason had been provided in the rejection order.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
This is such an important case! As working mothers, we constantly face these challenges. The judiciary should lead by example in supporting women professionals. Hope justice prevails 🙏
R
Rahul S.
While I sympathize with the ADJ, rules are rules. The High Court must have had valid reasons. The Supreme Court should examine if proper procedure was followed before making any exceptions.
A
Ananya M.
Shocking that they didn't even give a reason for rejection! For a single parent serving in judiciary, this is doubly difficult. Our systems need more empathy. #WorkLifeBalance
V
Vikram J.
Interesting case. The judiciary is examining its own functioning. Hope this sets a precedent for all working parents in government service. The 730-day policy itself seems quite generous though.
S
Sneha P.
As a lawyer myself, I know how tough it is for women in this profession. The transfer policy plus childcare issues make it worse. The High Court should have been more considerate, especially for someone with good ACRs.
K
Karan D.
The Supreme Court's question about approaching HC first is valid. But when systems don't work, people have to go to higher courts. Hope this case improves leave policies across the board 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50