NewKerala.com

Supreme Court Steps In: Can CAA-Eligible Migrants Vote in 2025?

The Supreme Court has asked the government and election authorities to respond to a plea about migrant voting rights. An NGO argues that people eligible for citizenship under the CAA are at risk of being unable to vote. These individuals fled religious persecution and have been waiting years for their applications to be processed. The court will hear the matter again soon to decide on provisional voter enrollment for them.

Key Points: SC Seeks Response on Plea for CAA Migrants' Provisional Voter Rights

  • Supreme Court seeks responses from Centre, ECI, and West Bengal on migrant voting rights
  • Petition argues migrants face disenfranchisement despite being on electoral rolls
  • Many persecuted minorities' citizenship applications remain pending since before 2014
  • NGO seeks provisional voter enrollment during Special Intensive Revision process
2 min read

SC issues notices on plea seeking provisional SIR for CAA-eligible migrants

Supreme Court issues notices on plea seeking provisional voter enrollment for CAA-eligible migrants from Bangladesh, citing risk of disenfranchisement.

"To prevent disenfranchisement... these individuals should be granted provisional voter enrollment. - Atmadeep NGO Petition"

New Delhi, Dec 1

The Supreme Court on Monday issued notices to the Centre, the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the West Bengal government on a plea seeking provisional Special Interim Revision (SIR) for Hindus, Buddhists and Christians who migrated to the state from Bangladesh before 2014.

The bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi took note of the petition filed by NGO Atmadeep and sought responses from the authorities concerned.

The matter will be heard next on December 9.

The petition contends that despite applying for Indian citizenship before 2014, many migrants -- who fled Bangladesh due to religious persecution -- have not received any relief or progress on their applications.

According to the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), such persecuted minorities are eligible for Indian citizenship.

The CAA’s provisions apply to Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who entered India on or before December 31, 2014, and were exempted under the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 or the Foreigners Act, 1946.

The 2019 amendment introduced a Section allowing these groups to apply for registration or naturalisation as Indian citizens.

The petition notes that several applications for naturalisation from eligible migrants remain pending due to administrative delays.

It further highlighted that many others are still awaiting an opportunity to apply for citizenship under Section 6B through the online mechanism introduced by the Citizenship (Amendment Rules), 2024.

The NGO also points out that a significant number of these migrants have been living in India for years, and their names already feature on the 2025 electoral rolls.

It argues that to prevent disenfranchisement during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR), these individuals should be granted provisional voter enrollment.

The plea urges the Supreme Court to issue directions ensuring protection for such applicants until their citizenship process is completed.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I understand the need for compassion, we must also ensure due process isn't bypassed. Granting provisional voter rights before citizenship is finalized is a very sensitive step. The court must balance humanitarian concerns with legal integrity.
P
Priyanka N
Administrative delays are the real villain here. These people are already on electoral rolls for 2025, which shows they are part of our social fabric. Why make them wait endlessly? The system needs to be more efficient.
A
Aman W
Bharat has always been a sanctuary for those facing religious persecution. The CAA was passed for this very reason. The implementation on ground is lagging. Hope the SC's notice speeds things up for these families.
K
Kavya N
It's a complex situation in border states like WB. While we should help persecuted minorities, we also have to be careful about demographic changes and local sentiments. The court's decision will set an important precedent.
V
Vikram M
The petition makes a valid point about disenfranchisement. If someone has applied in good faith and is eligible under the law, they shouldn't lose their right to vote because of bureaucratic red tape. Justice delayed is justice denied.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50