Supreme Court Delays Sonam Wangchuk NSA Case Amid Detention Battle

The Supreme Court has postponed the hearing on Sonam Wangchuk's detention case until December 8. His wife filed the petition challenging his incarceration under the National Security Act. The government requested more time to respond to the recent legal filings. Wangchuk remains in Jodhpur Central Jail while the legal battle continues.

Key Points: SC Adjourns Sonam Wangchuk NSA Detention Plea to December 8

  • Supreme Court adjourns NSA detention hearing to December 8 for government response
  • Wife's petition claims detention violates fundamental rights and procedural safeguards
  • Ladakh administration alleges Wangchuk incited unrest in Leh region
  • Climate activist currently detained in Jodhpur Central Jail since September
2 min read

SC defers plea challenging Sonam Wangchuk's detention to Dec 8

Supreme Court defers hearing on climate activist Sonam Wangchuk's NSA detention challenge filed by his wife. Next hearing scheduled for December 8, 2024.

"Illegal detention and arbitrary exercise violating his fundamental rights - Gitanjali J. Angmo's petition"

New Delhi, Nov 24

The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned to December 8 the hearing on a plea filed by Gitanjali J. Angmo, wife of jailed Ladakh-based climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, challenging his detention under the National Security Act (NSA).

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria was hearing Angmo's habeas corpus petition, which termed Wangchuk's incarceration "illegal" and an "arbitrary exercise violating his fundamental rights."

When the matter was taken up, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union government and the Union Territory of Ladakh, sought additional time to respond to the rejoinder recently filed by the petitioner side. Acceding to the request, the Justice Kumar-led Bench deferred further proceedings, posting the matter for December 8.

The top court had earlier permitted Angmo to amend her petition and directed the Centre, the UT administration, and jail authorities to file their additional replies. "The petitioner is permitted to amend the petition and file an amended copy within a week. The amended counter shall be filed within ten days thereafter. Rejoinder, if any, within a week thereafter. List on November 24," stated the court order passed on October 29.

In her amended petition, Angmo has contended that the detention order was passed mechanically, without application of mind, and that mandatory procedural safeguards under the NSA were not followed. She has also argued that the authorities acted in haste and failed to furnish adequate grounds of detention in a timely and meaningful manner, depriving Wangchuk of the opportunity to make an effective representation.

The Ladakh administration, in its earlier affidavit, has maintained that the detention was warranted in view of Wangchuk's alleged role in inciting unrest in Leh. It has further stated that the grounds of detention were duly communicated within the statutorily prescribed period and that the detention advisory board subsequently affirmed the decision.

Wangchuk, a prominent environmentalist and education reformer, was detained in September and later shifted to Jodhpur Central Jail in Rajasthan.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh Q
National Security Act is a serious matter. If the administration says he was inciting unrest, there must be some evidence. We should trust our institutions and wait for the court's final decision.
A
Ananya R
As someone from the mountains, I know how much Sonam sir has contributed to our region. His work with SECMOL and environmental activism has inspired thousands. Hope the Supreme Court ensures justice prevails. 🏔️
M
Michael C
While I respect the legal process, the repeated adjournments are worrying. The government keeps asking for more time while a citizen remains detained. The court should ensure speedy justice in such fundamental rights cases.
S
Shreya B
Ladakh is a sensitive border area and national security concerns are valid. But we also need to protect democratic rights. Hope the court finds the right balance in this case. 🤞
K
Karthik V
The fact that procedural safeguards weren't followed as claimed is serious. NSA shouldn't be used arbitrarily. Every citizen deserves proper legal procedure, regardless of the allegations against them.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50