Supreme Court Delays Sonam Wangchuk Case: What NSA Detention Battle Reveals

The Supreme Court has postponed the hearing on Sonam Wangchuk's detention case until November 24. Climate activist Wangchuk's wife filed the habeas corpus petition challenging his NSA detention. The court allowed additional documents to be submitted and gave both sides specific deadlines for filings. This case continues the legal battle over Wangchuk's detention since his arrest in September.

Key Points: Supreme Court Defers Sonam Wangchuk NSA Detention Hearing

  • Supreme Court grants one week for amended habeas corpus petition filing
  • Government given ten days to file additional counter responses
  • Wife Gitanjali challenges detention under National Security Act
  • Wangchuk transferred to Jodhpur Central Jail after September arrest
2 min read

SC defers hearing till November 24 on plea challenging Sonam Wangchuk's detention

Supreme Court postpones climate activist Sonam Wangchuk's habeas corpus plea hearing to November 24 amid NSA detention challenge filed by his wife.

"The petitioner is permitted to amend the petition and file an amended copy within a week - Supreme Court Order"

New Delhi, Oct 29

The Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred till November 24 the hearing on the habeas corpus plea filed by Ladakh-based climate activist Sonam Wangchuk’s wife, Gitanjali J. Angmo, challenging his detention under the National Security Act (NSA).

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria was hearing Angmo’s amended petition seeking Wangchuk’s release.

Appearing for Angmo, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, sought the top court’s permission to submit additional documents supporting the plea.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the second-highest law officer of the Centre, informed the Justice Kumar-led Bench that the amended application and accompanying affidavit were filed on Tuesday evening.

Allowing Sibal's prayer, the Justice Kumar-led Bench permitted the petitioner side to amend the habeas corpus and file the amended copy within a week.

It further directed the Union government, the Union Territory of Ladakh, the Deputy Commissioner of Leh, and the Jodhpur Central Jail authorities to file their additional responses within ten days thereafter.

Any rejoinder by the petitioner may be filed within a week following the government’s reply.

“The petitioner is permitted to amend the petition and file an amended copy within a week. The amended counter shall be filed within ten days thereafter. Rejoinder, if any, within a week thereafter. List on November 24,” the order stated.

The plea filed by Angmo challenges Wangchuk’s detention under the NSA, contending that the authorities had acted arbitrarily and failed to comply with mandatory procedural safeguards.

The Ladakh administration, in its previous affidavit, maintained that the grounds of detention were duly communicated to the activist within the prescribed period.

Wangchuk, a prominent environmentalist and education reformer, was detained in September after being accused of inciting unrest in Leh during a protest. He was subsequently transferred to Jodhpur Central Jail in Rajasthan.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
National Security Act is being misused here. Wangchuk was protesting for Ladakh's rights and environment. This sets a dangerous precedent for activists across India. Hope Supreme Court delivers justice soon.
A
Arjun K
While I respect Wangchuk's work, we must remember that national security cannot be compromised. If there's evidence of inciting unrest, the law must take its course. Let's trust our judicial process. 🤔
S
Sarah B
Transferring him to Jodhpur jail seems excessive. Ladakh to Rajasthan is a huge distance, making it difficult for family and lawyers. This feels like punishment before trial.
V
Vikram M
The man brought innovation to education in remote areas and worked for environmental conservation. Now he's in jail? Something doesn't add up. Hope truth prevails on Nov 24. 🙏
K
Kavya N
Procedural delays in such important cases are frustrating. Another month of waiting for justice. Our courts need to prioritize fundamental rights cases more urgently.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50