Russia says Ukraine main 'destabilising factor' in Black Sea region

Moscow, April 29: Blaming Ukraine for destabilisation in the Black Sea region, Russian Presidential aide and Maritime Board Chairman, Nikolay Patrushev, on Tuesday said that both Moscow and Washington are interested in ensuring the security of maritime traffic and the next step should be made by Kyiv.

"Clearly, the activities of Ukraine's armed forces and mercenaries are the main destabilising factor in the Black Sea region," Patrushev said in an interview with the Russian state-run news agency Tass.

He further added that the Kyiv regime repeatedly showed that it is impossible to negotiate with.

"At the same time, as we have already learned from practice, Kyiv has repeatedly demonstrated its total inability to negotiate with," said the Kremlin aide.

Last month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in an interview with a local broadcaster, said that the Russian side favours the resumption of the Black Sea Initiative, though in a format more acceptable to all, adding that this issue was discussed at talks in Riyadh as a priority.

"We support the return of the Black Sea Initiative in some form, better suited to all," he said.

"Our position is simple: we cannot take this man at his word," Lavrov said, referring to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Moscow, he said, is worried about the food situation in Africa and other countries of the Global South that have been affected by the conflict.

Following expert consultations between Russia and the United States in Riyadh, last month the Kremlin said in a statement that Moscow and Washington have agreed to guarantee implementation of the Black Sea initiative -- safe navigation and the prohibition of using commercial vessels for military purposes.

However, Russia said that until the West lifts sanctions on its ships and supplies of agricultural equipment, it will not rejoin the initiative.

The Black Sea Initiative, also known as the grain deal, allowed the supply of Ukrainian grain from Black Sea ports and ensured the normalisation of exports of Russian agricultural products and fertilizers to global markets.

However, Moscow withdrew from the deal in July 2023, stating that commitments to Russia weren't fulfilled. Moscow alleged that despite agreements, the West redirected the bulk of Ukrainian grain to its own countries, with the key target of the deal - to supply grain to countries in need - never being met.

Reader Comments

M

Michael T.

Interesting how Russia positions itself as concerned about global food security while simultaneously blocking grain exports. The cognitive dissonance is strong with this one. 🤔

S

Sarah K.

This feels like classic projection. The country that invaded its neighbor is calling THEM the destabilizing factor? The audacity...

J

James P.

While I don't agree with Russia's framing, I do think the article could have included more context about the grain deal's history. Balanced reporting helps readers understand complex situations better.

A

Anita L.

The Black Sea region has been tense for years, but calling Ukraine the sole problem is an oversimplification. There's enough blame to go around here.

D

David R.

"Kyiv regime" - interesting word choice. Shows how differently each side frames this conflict. Language matters in these situations.

E

Elena S.

The food security angle is concerning, but Russia can't have it both ways - either you care about feeding people or you use food as a weapon. Pick one.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.