Rubio's Geneva Silence: Why Secret Ukraine Peace Talks Fuel Speculation

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio remained tight-lipped about the specifics discussed in Geneva peace negotiations. He described the talks as productive but acknowledged several unresolved issues still on the table. Some differences involve semantics and require consultation with higher authorities before finalizing. The Ukrainian delegation notably did not return for a second briefing after initial progress reports.

Key Points: Rubio Withholds Details After US Ukraine Geneva Peace Talks

  • Rubio confirmed progress in US-Ukraine talks but withheld negotiation details
  • Both sides described discussions as productive despite unresolved issues
  • Some differences involve semantics and require higher-level decisions
  • European Union and NATO roles remain key points needing further discussion
2 min read

Rubio declines to disclose details of US-Ukraine Geneva talks

US Secretary Marco Rubio declines to reveal specifics from Geneva negotiations on 28-point Ukraine peace plan, citing "productive" progress but remaining differences.

"The items that remain open are not insurmountable - Marco Rubio"

Geneva, Nov 24

After further talks with the Ukrainian delegation, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio declined to reveal any details of the day's discussions in Geneva between the United States, Ukraine, and European partners on a 28-point peace plan.

At a press briefing on Sunday, at around 6 p.m. local time, both the US and Ukrainian sides confirmed "progress" in their earlier talks about the US-proposed plan to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Although they told reporters to wait for updates later in the evening, only Rubio returned to the press two and a half hours later.

He said he was not prepared to provide any details on the specific issues under negotiation, Xinhua news agency reported.

Rubio reiterated that the day's negotiations had been "productive," adding that he remained "very optimistic" about reaching an agreement within a "very reasonable period of time very soon." However, he also noted that "There's no agreement yet … (some) require higher-level decisions and consultation." He added that the differences include semantics or language, and there are still issues "need more time to work through."

"The items that remain open are not insurmountable," he emphasized. He added that some contents involve equities or the role of the European Union or of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, requiring further discussion with the European partners.

The Ukrainian delegation did not return for a second briefing.

Following the talks, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on social media that it was essential to ensure that "the steps to end the war are effective, and that everything is doable."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
From India's perspective, we understand the need for confidential diplomacy. Sometimes keeping negotiations private helps build trust between parties. Hope this brings lasting peace to the region.
A
Arjun K
The fact that Ukrainian delegation didn't return for second briefing speaks volumes. Must be complex negotiations. As Indians who value peace, we hope for a resolution that respects all parties' concerns.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the need for diplomatic discretion, the lack of transparency makes me uneasy. The world is watching and hoping for peace, but we need some assurance that progress is genuine.
V
Vikram M
As an Indian following this conflict, I appreciate Zelensky's practical approach. "Everything must be doable" - that's the key. No point in agreements that can't be implemented on ground. 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
28-point peace plan sounds comprehensive but complex. The involvement of EU and NATO makes it even more complicated. Hope they find common ground soon for the sake of innocent civilians suffering in this conflict.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50