Key Points

RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale ignited a political storm by suggesting a review of ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in the Constitution’s Preamble, calling them Emergency-era additions. While Shiv Sena supported the demand, Congress and RJD accused the RSS of undermining constitutional values. Opposition leaders warned of fierce resistance, invoking Ambedkar’s original draft and India’s secular ethos. The debate revives old fault lines over the 42nd Amendment and BJP-RSS’s constitutional vision.

Key Points: RSS Sparks Row Over Socialist Secular Preamble Review Demand

  • RSS seeks review of Preamble terms added in 1975 Emergency
  • Congress-RJD slam move as anti-constitutional
  • Shiv Sena backs demand citing original Ambedkar draft
  • Opposition warns of resistance from socialist forces
3 min read

RSS call to review 'Socialist' and 'Secular' in Constitution's Preamble sparks political uproar

RSS chief Hosabale’s call to debate ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in Constitution’s Preamble triggers Congress-RJD backlash, Shiv Sena support.

"The words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ were added during Emergency... There should be a discussion on whether they should remain – Dattatreya Hosabale"

New Delhi, June 27

A fresh controversy erupted on Friday after Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale called for a review of the words "socialist" and "secular" in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution.

The remarks, made at an event in Delhi, drew sharp criticism from the Congress and the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), while Shiv Sena came out in support of the suggestion.

Hosabale, speaking at the Ambedkar International Centre, said: "The words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ were added to the Preamble during the Emergency. No attempt was made to remove them later. There should be a discussion on whether they should remain. I say this in a building named after Babasaheb Ambedkar, whose original Constitution did not include these terms in the Preamble."

Speaking to IANS, Shiv Sena leader Shaina NC backed the RSS leader's remarks, stating: "He is absolutely right. The words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ were not part of the original Preamble of the Constitution drafted by BR Ambedkar. These were added during the Emergency in 1975, when then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi introduced the 42nd Constitutional Amendment. This raises a question—why highlight only these two terms when India is already a sovereign, democratic republic?"

She added that the Congress should apologise for the Emergency era amendments, saying: "Shiv Sena demands that the Congress party apologise publicly for the Emergency. These terms were not in the original draft, and they should be removed."

On the other hand, Congress leader Tariq Anwar condemned Hosabale’s remarks, saying: "There’s a clear scent of communalism in his statement. India is secular by nature and by history. The Constitution guarantees the right to equality, the right to vote, and the right to practice one’s religion. As for socialism, it aims to reduce inequality. We are striving to create a just society, and the term ‘socialism’ symbolises that effort."

RJD leader Shakti Singh Yadav also slammed the RSS, accusing it of repeatedly attempting to undermine the Constitution’s foundational principles.

"The RSS has always wanted to change the Constitution. The BJP is merely the political face of the RSS, and after coming to power, they are trying to implement the RSS’s ideology. Narendra Modi is not just the Prime Minister of India; he represents the RSS's mission. Their agenda to remove socialism and secularism will not be accepted by the people."

Yadav added that socialist forces in India would resist any such move.

"Even if a drop of blood remains in our bodies, no one will dare to erase socialism and secularism from the Constitution. These people are the same ones who once opposed the Constitution, and now they roam around holding its copy. They should first apologise for the past. This is a direct assault on the spirit of the Constitution."

"The RSS and BJP talk of changing the Constitution, but they should remember—socialists will not remain silent. Our leader, Lalu Prasad Yadav, remains the national President of RJD. Don’t make the mistake of underestimating us," he warned.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
The original Constitution was carefully drafted by Ambedkar ji and team. If words were added later without proper debate, it's fair to review them. But any change must go through proper constitutional process, not unilateral decisions. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
Why is RSS suddenly so concerned about the Preamble? India's strength lies in its diversity and secular fabric. Even if the words were added later, they represent our values today. Focus on real issues like unemployment instead!
A
Arjun S.
Interesting historical point about Emergency-era changes. But let's not forget - constitutions evolve with time. The real question is: do these words still serve their purpose in 21st century India? Need calm discussion, not political mudslinging.
S
Sunita T.
Secularism is in India's DNA since ancient times - from Ashoka's edicts to Akbar's Din-i-Ilahi. Whether the word is in Preamble or not, we've always respected all faiths. This debate feels unnecessary and divisive 😕
V
Vikram J.
The way some politicians are reacting shows they haven't even read the full speech. Hosabale ji only suggested a discussion, not immediate removal. Healthy debate is good for democracy, no? Why so defensive?
N
Neha P.
Instead of fighting over words, let's focus on implementing their spirit! What's the use of 'socialist' in Preamble when wealth gap is increasing? And 'secular' when minorities feel insecure? Action matters more than terminology.
K

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50