Key Points

Greg Chappell has raised questions about Ravindra Jadeja's batting approach during the crucial Lord's Test match against England. While Jadeja scored a gritty 61 not out, Chappell believes he should have taken more calculated risks to chase down the target. The former coach compared Jadeja's performance to Ben Stokes' legendary aggressive innings at Headingley. India ultimately lost the match, falling 2-1 behind in the five-match series.

Key Points: Chappell Challenges Jadeja's Defensive Batting at Lord's Test

  • Greg Chappell questions Jadeja's conservative batting strategy
  • Jadeja scored 61 not out but India lost by 22 runs
  • Compared approach to Ben Stokes' aggressive Headingley innings
  • Suggests more proactive batting was needed to chase target
2 min read

'Was it the right one?': Chappell questions Jadeja's approach at Lord's

Greg Chappell criticizes Ravindra Jadeja's cautious approach in India's crucial Lord's Test loss against England

'Was it the right one?': Chappell questions Jadeja's approach at Lord's
"You are the man who has to get this done. The tail's job is to hang in there with you, but you must go for the win. - Greg Chappell"

New Delhi, July 19

Former India head coach Greg Chappell questioned whether Ravindra Jadeja's disciplined knock of 61 not out off 181 balls was the right approach in the chase of 193 in the third Test against England at Lord's, citing that the all-rounder had to take calculated risks and not just block boundaries.

On the final day's play, Jadeja was at his gritty and defiant best to hit his fourth successive fifty in Tests. But that valiant effort went in vain as India lost by 22 runs at Lord's and now find themselves 2-1 behind in the five-match series against England.

"The Lord's Test also provided a telling moment with the way Jadeja was managed late in the match. Left with the tail, Jadeja did what many specialist batters do in that situation: he shielded the tail, farmed the strike, and played conservatively. On the surface, it was a disciplined innings. But was it the right one?"

"The truth is, Jadeja was the only recognised batter left. If India were to chase down the target, he had to take calculated risks. His job wasn't to leave balls and collect singles - it was to win the match. That clarity should have come from the dressing room, from the captain."

"He needed to be told directly: 'You are the man who has to get this done. The tail's job is to hang in there with you, but you must go for the win'," wrote Chappell in his column for ESPNcricinfo on Saturday.

Jadeja also shared defiant partnerships of 35 and 23 coming off 132 and 80 deliveries with Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj respectively. But Chappell chose to recall how England faced a similar situation and skipper Ben Stokes went the aggressive way to ensure his team won over Australia in the famous Headingley Test in 2019.

"We saw exactly that from England's Ben Stokes against Australia in Leeds in 2019. In a similar situation, he backed himself and produced one of the best innings of the past 50 years. Importantly, Stokes played that innings knowing that, succeed or fail, his team and leadership would have his back. That's the mindset that needs to be fostered in any great team," he concluded.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As a cricket fan living in India, I think Jadeja showed great temperament. Not every player can be Stokes - that innings was once in a generation stuff. We should appreciate Jadeja's fighting spirit rather than criticize his approach.
A
Arjun K
Chappell is right yaar! When you're the last proper batsman, you have to take charge. Jadeja played too defensively when we needed 4 runs per over. Our team lacks that killer instinct in crunch situations. Hope they learn from this!
P
Priya S
The real issue isn't Jadeja's approach but why our top order collapsed again! We can't keep expecting our all-rounders and tailenders to bail us out. Our batting lineup needs serious work before the next Test. 😤
M
Michael C
Having watched cricket in India for 10 years, I think this shows the cultural difference in approach. Indian cricket traditionally values patience and defense, while England encourages aggression. Neither is right or wrong - just different philosophies.
K
Kavya N
Where was this criticism when Pujara plays his slow innings? Jadeja at least scored runs when others failed. The problem is with team management not giving clear instructions, not with Jadeja's effort. He fought like a lion! 🦁
V
Vikram M

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50