Key Points

Chief Justice of India BR Gavai has clarified that his comments during a PIL hearing were being misrepresented on social media. The controversy arose from remarks made about reconstructing a beheaded Lord Vishnu idol at Khajuraho's Javari Temple. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and senior advocate Kapil Sibal both commented on how social media amplifies court proceedings disproportionately. The PIL highlighted neglect of Khajuraho temples despite their UNESCO World Heritage status.

Key Points: CJI Gavai Clarifies Vishnu Idol Remarks Respects All Religions

  • CJI Gavai clarifies his remarks were misportrayed on social media platforms
  • Solicitor General notes disproportionate social media reactions to court statements
  • PIL sought reconstruction of beheaded Vishnu idol at Khajuraho temple
  • Kapil Sibal calls social media an unruly horse that cannot be tamed
2 min read

'I respect all religions': CJI Gavai clarifies remarks on reconstruction of beheaded Lord Vishnu idol

CJI BR Gavai addresses social media backlash over temple idol reconstruction comments, clarifying his respect for all faiths amid PIL hearing controversy.

'I respect all religions': CJI Gavai clarifies remarks on reconstruction of beheaded Lord Vishnu idol
"I respect all religions - CJI BR Gavai"

New Delhi, Sep 18

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai on Thursday clarified that his remarks during the hearing of a PIL seeking judicial intervention for the reconstruction of a 7-foot-long beheaded idol of Lord Vishnu at the Javari Temple in Khajuraho were being misportrayed on social media.

"Someone told me the other day that the comments I made have been portrayed on social media in a certain manner. I respect all religions," said CJI Gavai.

Though the apex court declined to entertain the public interest litigation (PIL), CJI Gavai on Tuesday had reportedly remarked: "Go and ask the deity himself to do something", and suggested the PIL litigant, "so go and pray now".

The remarks sparked a debate on social media, with many describing them as insensitive and disrespectful to the faith of millions of followers of Lord Vishnu.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the second-highest law officer of the Centre, remarked that things often get blown out of proportion on social media.

"We used to know Newton's Law - every action has an equal reaction, but now every action has a disproportionate social media reaction," he quipped.

In a similar vein, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who was also present in the courtroom, said: "We suffer this every day. Social media is an unruly horse, and there is no way to tame it!"

The PIL, filed by Rakesh Dalal, National President of the National Veer Kisan Majdoor Dal, highlighted the long-standing neglect of temples within the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Khajuraho complex by both the Union and Madhya Pradesh governments, despite repeated representations. "The temples of Khajuraho, constructed by the Chandravanshi kings, also served as a ‘Paathshaala’ in ancient times. However, despite 77 years post-independence, the authorities have failed to take steps for their development and reconstruction of these temples to grant people their fundamental right to worship," stated the PIL filed through Nuli & Nuli.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I understand the CJI's point about social media exaggeration, the original remark about "asking the deity" did feel a bit insensitive. Our judges should be more careful with religious sentiments.
V
Vikram M
Khajuraho temples are our national heritage! It's shameful that they've been neglected for so long. The government should prioritize restoring these ancient structures regardless of the PIL outcome. 🛕
A
Ananya R
SG Mehta is absolutely right about social media reactions being disproportionate. Newton's law modified for digital age! 😄 But seriously, we need to stop outrage culture.
K
Karthik V
The real issue here is the neglect of our cultural heritage. Whether through judicial intervention or government action, these ancient temples deserve proper maintenance and respect.
S
Sneha F
As a law student, I find this fascinating. The court was right to decline the PIL - temples maintenance is executive function, not judicial. But the social media reaction shows how emotionally charged religious matters are in India.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50