Key Points

NCP leader Chhagan Bhujbal has taken a firm stand against providing reservation based on economic status. He asserts that reservation is a tool for social justice, not poverty alleviation, and must protect socially backward classes like OBCs. Bhujbal is preparing to challenge the government's decision on Maratha quotas in the Supreme Court. He also criticized the pressure tactics used by Maratha quota activists, calling them unconstitutional.

Key Points: Chhagan Bhujbal Opposes Economic Quota Amid Maratha OBC Row

  • Bhujbal argues OBCs are a socially backward class requiring constitutional protection
  • He plans a legal battle in Supreme Court against the government's Maratha quota move
  • The minister criticizes Maratha activist Manoj Jarange-Patil for holding the state captive
  • Bhujbal states no community can be declared backward due to political pressure
3 min read

'Reservation not poverty alleviation programme': Chhagan Bhujbal opposes quota based on economic status

NCP Minister Chhagan Bhujbal declares reservation is not for poverty alleviation, firmly opposing economic status-based quotas to protect OBC interests.

"Reservation is not a poverty alleviation programme. - Chhagan Bhujbal"

Nashik, Sep 25

Amid ongoing protests by Marathas, OBCs, Banjaras and Adivasis over reservations, the NCP minister and Samata Parishad founder Chhagan Bhujbal on Thursday said that reservation is not a poverty alleviation programme while countering party president and Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar’s statement that he had not reason to disagree with reservation based on economic status.

“Reservation is not a poverty alleviation programme. Maratha is a community, a caste while OBC is a class with many castes in it. This is why the OBC reservation is there. OBCs are socially backward. Therefore, we are against giving reservation based on economic status,” said minister Bhujbal who has already opposed the release of the government resolution by the MahaYuti government providing Kunbi certificates to the Marathas.

He has already appealed to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to scrap the same government resolution or modify that citing it has been adversely impacting the OBCs.

Incidentally, NCP-SP working president Supriya Sule recently supported reservation based on economic criteria.

“Reservation has to be for people who really need it. I cannot ask for a reservation because my parents are educated, I’m educated, and my children are educated. Shame on me if I apply for it. It is for somebody who probably did not have an education and needed it. If my child is studying in Mumbai and is going to one of the good schools, there could also be a child brighter than mine in maybe Chandrapur who does not have access to this kind of education,” she added.

Minister Bhujbal said, “Our country has a democratic system and we have complete faith in the judiciary. Therefore, we will fight both legal and street battles to maintain OBC reservation. A petition will be filed soon in the Supreme Court objecting to the government's decision regarding Maratha reservation. No government can include anyone in reservation nor can anyone be excluded from reservation. However, the government made an attempt to do so. It says that a person with a Kunbi record can give an affidavit to members in his clan and relatives. Through which they will get a caste certificate.”

“The government resolution is a blow to the OBCs as the members of OBC community say that now our reservation is over, so some of them are sacrificing themselves by committing suicide. We will fight with courage, patience and unity like the ancestors of Chhatrapati Shivji Maharaj. We will stand firmly behind the OBCs,” Bhujbal added.

He said that the children of OBCs in the state want education and jobs. Gross injustice is being done to OBCs while providing grants and implementing schemes.

Referring to the recent agitation by pro-Maratha quota activist Manoj Jarange-Patil, minister Bhujbal criticised that the entire Maharashtra is being held captive demanding Kunbi status to Marathas which is against the Constitution and also against various court orders.

He, however, commented that no community can be declared socially backward due to political pressure. Therefore, there should be no attempt to include the Maratha community among the backward classes.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who has studied reservation policies, I think Supriya Sule has a more balanced approach. Economic criteria alongside social backwardness could be the way forward. The current system needs reform to help those truly disadvantaged.
P
Priya S
This reservation politics is getting out of hand. Instead of fighting over limited seats, why isn't the government creating more educational institutions and job opportunities? That would solve the real problem. 🤔
R
Rohit P
As an OBC student, I appreciate Bhujbal standing up for our rights. Marathas are politically dominant in Maharashtra - calling them socially backward doesn't make sense. Reservation should be for those who genuinely need it, not for vote bank politics.
M
Michael C
While I understand the historical context, the current reservation system seems to be creating more divisions than solving problems. Maybe it's time for a complete review with fresh data about who actually needs support in 2024.
K
Kavya N
The suicide mention is heartbreaking. No policy should push people to such extremes. Government needs to handle this sensitively rather than playing community against community. 🙏
V
Vikram M
Both sides have valid arguments, but the solution lies in sunset clauses and periodic reviews. Communities that have benefited should graduate out, making room for others who need

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50