Key Points

Congress has strongly rebutted BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s criticism of Rahul Gandhi, calling his arguments baseless. Supriya Shrinate clarified that Congress had withdrawn support from the Chandrashekhar government before the 1991 pact was signed. The party accused Dubey of distorting facts to target Gandhi. The debate follows Rahul Gandhi’s recent questioning of EAM Jaishankar’s statements on military operations.

Key Points: Congress Slams BJP's Nishikant Dubey Over Rahul Gandhi Criticism

  • Congress refutes Dubey's claims on 1991 Indo-Pak pact
  • Shrinate cites Rajiv Gandhi's withdrawal from Chandrashekhar govt
  • BJP accused of misrepresenting facts
  • Rahul Gandhi's criticism of Jaishankar sparks debate
3 min read

Repeatedly displays his stupidity: Congress slams BJP's Nishikant Dubey over his criticism of Rahul Gandhi

Congress hits back at BJP's Nishikant Dubey for targeting Rahul Gandhi over a 1991 Indo-Pak pact, calling his remarks "repeated stupidity."

"First of all, Nishikant Dubey repeatedly displays his stupidity. – Supriya Shrinate"

New Delhi, May 23

Congress leader Supriya Shrinate on Friday hit back at BJP MP Nishikant Dubey over his reference of a 1991 Indo-Pak military transparency pact to target Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi, stating that the latter "repeatedly displays his stupidity."

Speaking to ANI, Shrinate pointed out that the Congress withdrew its support from the former Prime Minister Chandrashekhar's government in March 1991 while the agreement was signed in April.

"First of all, Nishikant Dubey repeatedly displays his stupidity. Former PM Rajiv Gandhi withdrew support from the Chandrashekhar government on 6 March 1991. First of all, this is probably an agreement signed in April 1991. This agreement is for peacetime. It is about ensuring that there is no misunderstanding between the armies of the two countries during peacetime," she said.

"When we have taken action now, there was a terrorist attack on us, we have retaliated aggressively... So first of all, Nishikant Dubey and the BJP are accepting that EAM Jaishankar informed, and what Rahul Gandhi was saying was the truth. Jaishankar informed Pakistan, and the BJP itself is confirming it... The agreement he is referring to is a peace-time agreement. Jaishankar ji had informed that there would be a war-like situation," Supriya Shrinate said.

Congress leader Pawan Khera also defended Rahul Gandhi's recent criticism of External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar.

Khera dismissed the allegation, stating, 'This person needs to know that in late February 1991, the Indian National Congress had already withdrawn support from the Chandrashekhar government, and elections to the 10th Lok Sabha had been announced.'"

The row began after BJP MP Nishikant Dubey took to X to accuse Rahul Gandhi of hypocrisy. Citing a 1991 agreement signed under a Congress-backed government, Dubey claimed it obligated India and Pakistan to exchange information about military deployments and attacks.

He wrote, "Rahul Gandhi ji, this is an agreement made during the time of your government. In 1991, your party-supported government agreed that India and Pakistan would exchange information about any attack or army movement. Is this agreement treason?

Further adding to his criticism, Dubey said, "Congress is hand in glove with the Pakistani vote bank, does it suit you to make objectionable comments on Foreign Minister Dr S. Jaishankar ji?".

This exchange follows Rahul Gandhi's renewed criticism earlier this week of External Affairs Minister Jaishankar. The Congress leader questioned the minister's silence on the number of Indian Air Force aircraft lost during Operation Sindoor, insisting that the nation "deserves the truth."

Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7 as a retaliation for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. It targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK), resulting in the deaths of over 100 terrorists. In response, Pakistan shelled border areas and carried out drone attacks, prompting India to conduct airstrikes on 11 Pakistani airbases. Both countries agreed to cease hostilities on May 10.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Amit K.
Why do our politicians keep dragging Pakistan into every debate? We should focus on current issues rather than digging up 30-year-old agreements. Both BJP and Congress are guilty of this distraction politics. 🙄
P
Priya M.
Shrinate makes valid points about the timeline, but why can't our leaders debate policies instead of calling each other stupid? This childish name-calling makes our democracy look bad on international platforms.
R
Rahul S.
Operation Sindoor was a strong response to terrorism. Instead of questioning our forces' sacrifices, opposition should stand united against Pakistan's aggression. National security shouldn't be politicized like this.
S
Sunita T.
The 1991 agreement was for peace time - that's an important distinction! But honestly, I'm tired of both parties using Pakistan as a punching bag. Can we talk about inflation and jobs instead? 😩
V
Vikram J.
Dubey's "Pakistani vote bank" comment is unnecessary. We're a mature democracy - criticism of ministers should be welcomed, not labeled anti-national. But Rahul Gandhi could present his questions more constructively.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50