RBI's FEMA Order: How Nearbuy India Settled a ₹108 Crore Violation Case

The Reserve Bank of India has settled a case against Nearbuy India for Foreign Exchange Management Act violations. This action came after an investigation by the Enforcement Directorate into the company's financial reporting. Nearbuy was found to have delayed reporting on foreign transactions totaling over ₹108 crore. By paying a compounding fee, the company has avoided further legal proceedings.

Key Points: RBI Issues FEMA Compounding Order for Nearbuy India Pvt Ltd

  • The RBI compounded violations after ED investigation and a 'No Objection'
  • Contraventions involved late reporting of foreign inward payments worth ₹35.82 crore
  • Also included late filing of Form FCGPR for share issuance covering ₹73.01 crore
  • The company paid a one-time compounding fee of ₹4,28,297 to settle the case
2 min read

RBI issued compounding order for FEMA violations by Nearbuy India Pvt. Ltd: ED

The RBI has compounded FEMA violations by Nearbuy India, terminating proceedings after a ₹4.28 lakh penalty for late reporting of over ₹108 crore in foreign transactions.

"This has resulted in the termination of adjudication proceedings under the provisions of FEMA, as well as further litigation against the company and its office bearers - Directorate of Enforcement (ED)"

New Delhi, Dec 19

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued a compounding order under Section 15 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA), in the case of Nearbuy India Private Limited which has resulted in the termination of proceedings against the company for alleged contraventions of the act, the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) said on Friday.

The order was passed by the RBI on October 17 after the issuance of "No Objection" by the ED, an agency statement said.

In this case, based on credible information received, an investigation was taken up by the ED under the provisions of the act. After completion of investigation, the agency filed a complaint under FEMA before the Adjudicating Authority on Decemb er 3, 2024 pointing out the contraventions under the FEMA which include late reporting of foreign inward payments under Para 9(1)(A) of Schedule 1 to FEMA 20/2000-RB, covering Rs. 35.82 crore, late filing of Form FCGPR after issuing shares under Para 9(1)(B) of the same schedule, covering Rs 73.01 crore.

The RBI has now done the compounding for these contraventions, the statement said.

As per the provisions of FEMA, the adjudication proceedings were initiated by the Adjudicating Authority by issuance of a show cause notice dated February 27, under Section 16 of FEMA, to the company and its directors and officers who were in charge and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company during the relevant period during which the contravention of norms took place.

The company, later on, filed an application before the RBI for compounding of these contraventions under FEMA as per the provisions of Section 15.

On reference from the RBI, the ED issued a “no objection” for such compounding in line with the spirit of the Act. Accordingly, the RBI, on the basis of no objection issued by the ED, has compounded the said contraventions vide compounding order with a one-time payment of Rs 4,28,297.

This has resulted in the termination of adjudication proceedings under the provisions of FEMA, as well as further litigation against the company and its office bearers, the statement added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
This is a bit concerning. The contraventions involved over ₹100 crores in foreign transactions, and the penalty is less than 0.5%? While I understand the need for compounding, it shouldn't feel like a mere slap on the wrist. Compliance deadlines exist for a reason. 🤔
A
Aman W
As someone who runs a small export business, I know how complex FEMA reporting can be. Sometimes delays happen due to banking procedures or documentation from foreign clients. The compounding provision under Section 15 is a practical solution. Kudos to RBI and ED for the coordinated approach.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the process. The ED investigates, files a complaint, and then issues a 'No Objection' for the RBI to compound. It shows there is a structured mechanism in place. Transparency in such financial enforcement actions is crucial for investor confidence.
K
Karthik V
The key detail is "late reporting" and "late filing". It wasn't about hiding money or fraud, but procedural delays. For a growing startup like Nearbuy might have been, such compliance can slip. The system allowed them to rectify it. Hope they've now strengthened their finance team! 💼
N
Nikhil C
This is a positive signal for the business environment. It shows that authorities are willing to resolve issues pragmatically if the intent is not malicious. Termination of further litigation is a big relief for any company. More such clarity will ease doing business in India.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50