Key Points

Ravi Shastri believes Rohit Sharma should have played the decisive Sydney Test against Australia despite his slump. The former coach argued Rohit’s match-winning ability could have leveled the series. Shastri revealed this during an IPL encounter, emphasizing his aggressive coaching philosophy. Rohit retired from Tests earlier this month after averaging just 10.93 in his last eight matches.

Key Points: Ravi Shastri says he would have played Rohit in Australia Test decider

  • Shastri disagreed with Rohit skipping Sydney Test despite poor form
  • Backed Rohit as a game-changer in crucial matches
  • Series could have been leveled with his contribution
  • Rohit averaged 10.93 in his last 8 Tests before retirement
3 min read

Ravi Shastri says if he was coach, Rohit would have played last Test of Australia series

Former coach Shastri reveals he would have insisted Rohit Sharma play the final Border-Gavaskar Test despite poor form, calling him a match-winner.

"If I was the coach, you would have never not played that last Test match... the series wasn’t over. – Ravi Shastri"

New Delhi May 16

India team's former head coach Ravi Shastri has revealed what he would have told Rohit Sharma ahead of the final match of the Test series against Australia in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, which the then skipper did not play.

Rohit announced his retirement from Test cricket earlier this month.

Rohit's lean patch with the bat in the Test format led to the 38-year-old sitting out the Border-Gavaskar series decider at the SCG in January.

Shastri talked about a conversation he had with Rohit at an Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 fixture and prior to Hitman's Test retirement.

"I saw Rohit a lot at the toss. At the toss, you don't get enough time to speak. Though I did put my hand on his shoulder in one of the games. I think it was in Mumbai, and I told him, if I was the coach, you would have never not played that last Test match. You would have played that last Test match because the series wasn't over," Shastri told ICC Review.

"And I'm not someone who threw in the towel with the scoreline 2-1. If your mindset is you feel you are... that's not the stage, you leave a team."

Rohit didn't play the first test against Australia due to personal reasons, In his rest three outings, Rohit only made 31 runs before opting out from the last Test. In his last eight Tests, which included home series against Bangladesh and New Zealand, Rohit was able to cross the 50-run mark only once, averaging 10.93.

Shastri believes Rohit is a match-winner and he would've pushed for his inclusion in Sydney, with the series poised at 2-1.

"That was a 30-40 run game. And that's exactly what I told him. The pitch was so spicy in Sydney. Whatever kind of form he was in, he's a match-winner," said Shastri.

Shastri believes that if Rohit would have smashed 35-40 at the top, the series would have been levelled.

"If he had gone, sensed the situation, sensed the condition and smashed it for even 35-40 at the top, you never know. That series would have been level. But that's each one to his own."

"Other people have different styles. This would have been my style, and I let him know it. It's sitting in my heart for a long time. I had to get it out. And I told him that," he added.

Rohit took to social media earlier this month to announce that he is bidding farewell to the red-ball format. "Hello everyone, I would just like to share that I am retiring from Test cricket. It's been an absolute honour to represent my country in whites. Thank you for all the love and support over the years. I will continue to represent India in the ODI format," he said.

The 38-year-old embarked on a voyage and represented India in 67 Tests, striking 4,301 runs from his bat at an average of 40.57, with 12 centuries and 18 half-centuries. Rohit dazzled with a knock of 212 during a home series against South Africa in 2019.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Shastri is absolutely right! Rohit is a big match player and should have played that final Test. Even if he was out of form, his presence could have lifted the team's morale. Series was still alive at 2-1! 🇮🇳🏏 #TeamIndia
P
Priya M.
I think Rohit made the right call. When you're not in form, sometimes it's better to step back and let others take charge. Cricket is a team sport after all. His Test career stats speak for themselves - 12 centuries is no joke!
A
Amit S.
Shastri's comments seem a bit harsh. Coaches should support players' decisions, not publicly second-guess them years later. Rohit gave his all for India in Tests - remember that double century against SA? Legendary knock!
N
Neha P.
As a Mumbaikar, I've seen Rohit's magic at Wankhede many times. Form is temporary, class is permanent! Maybe he could have turned it around in that Sydney Test. But we should respect his decision - he knows his body and mind best.
V
Vikram J.
Interesting perspective from Shastri. But let's not forget - cricket has changed. Player workload management is crucial these days, especially for someone playing all formats. Rohit's focus on ODIs might be best for Team India's future.
S
Sanjay R.
Both legends in their own right! Shastri the aggressive coach vs Rohit the thoughtful captain. Different approaches, but same love for Indian cricket. Let's celebrate Rohit's Test career rather than debate one match decision. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50