Key Points

Ravi Shastri staunchly defends India's 38.5% share of ICC revenues, calling it justified given the country's outsized financial contribution to global cricket. The former coach argues broadcast rights and sponsorship deals during India matches generate disproportionate income for the sport. He questions the necessity of an ICC Test fund while pointing to administrative accountability issues in struggling cricket boards. Shastri's comments come as traditional powerhouses India, England and Australia collectively receive nearly half of ICC's total revenue distribution.

Key Points: Ravi Shastri Defends India's 38.5% ICC Revenue Share as Fair

  • Shastri argues India's 38.5% ICC share reflects revenue contribution
  • Questions need for ICC Test fund amid accountability concerns
  • Notes historical shifts in cricket's financial power centers
  • Highlights India's unmatched TV rights and sponsorship earnings
3 min read

Ravi Shastri backs India's major share in ICC revenue

Former India coach Ravi Shastri justifies India's dominant ICC revenue share, citing its massive contribution to global cricket finances.

"I would want more for India. Because half the money - most of the money - that's generated comes from India. - Ravi Shastri"

New Delhi, June 20

Former India head coach Ravi Shastri has weighed in on the International Cricket Council's (ICC) event revenue distribution model for the 2024-27 cycle, strongly defending India's large share of the earnings.

Speaking on the Wisden Cricket Weekly Podcast, Shastri justified the allocation, asserting that India's dominant contribution to global cricket revenue makes the share fair.

"I would want more (for India). Because half the money - most of the money - that's generated comes from India. So it's only fair that they get their share of... pound of flesh. And it's relative, you know, it's economies," said Shastri, as quoted from Wisden.

According to the model, over 88% of the ICC's revenue is distributed among the 12 Full Member (Test-playing) nations. Of this, a significant 48.2% is split between the three traditional powerhouses of the game, India, England, and Australia.

India alone receives 38.5% of the total share.

"Tomorrow there might be another economy that's stronger. Money might come from there like it did in the seventies, eighties. And the chunk of the money went to... you know, went somewhere else," he added, as quoted from Wisden.

"So I think it's only fair and it just shows in the revenues. When India travel, look at the television rights, look at the television, income that comes, for an India series. So it's only fair that they get whatever they're getting now, if not more," he noted.

Shastri, who was recently honoured with a suite named after him at Lord's during the World Test Championship final, also voiced his disagreement with the idea of a centrally managed Test fund under the ICC, which has been proposed as a way to support the traditional format of the game globally.

"Why do you need it? You know, from what is coming now and what the share is, there could be a certain amount of money kept for those countries to promote the game," Shastri said.

He added, "There will be central support and it can come through this (fund), but you also have to question, why are cricket boards losing money hand over fist? Is the administration okay? Are they being handled properly? Is the game being run properly? And is there accountability? For me, that is the key. Is there accountability when there's money being paid?"

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun P.
Shastri is absolutely right! India generates 70-80% of cricket's global revenue through sponsorships, broadcasting rights, and fan engagement. Why shouldn't we get a fair share? Other nations should focus on improving their cricket economy rather than complaining. 🇮🇳🏏
P
Priya K.
While I agree India contributes most to cricket revenue, 38.5% seems excessive. Smaller cricket nations need support to grow the game globally. A more balanced approach would be better for cricket's future. Maybe 30% for India and more development funds?
R
Rahul S.
Typical Shastri style - straight talk! 😄 But he's spot on. When India plays, stadiums are packed, TRPs skyrocket. Even foreign players earn big through IPL because of Indian fans. This is simple economics - where the money comes from, gets the lion's share.
S
Sneha M.
I respect Shastri but disagree about the Test fund. Test cricket is dying in many countries. ICC should protect the purest form of the game. India can afford to share a small percentage to keep Test cricket alive worldwide. Tradition matters!
V
Vikram D.
This is like BCCI vs the world debate again. Truth is - no India, no money. Simple. Other boards should be thankful we're not demanding 50% share! Look at the crowds when India tours vs when others play bilateral series. No comparison!
N
Neha R.
Shastri makes valid points about accountability. Many cricket boards mismanage funds. But I wish some of India's share could be used to develop women's cricket globally. That would be a great legacy for Indian cricket to leave behind. 👏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50