Rajya Sabha's Midnight Debate: Why Congress Slams MGNREGA Replacement Bill

The Rajya Sabha engaged in a heated debate that stretched past midnight over a bill to replace the MGNREGA. Congress members strongly opposed the legislation, demanding it be sent to a parliamentary committee for scrutiny. They accused the government of dismantling a rights-based welfare scheme and vowed to restore the original MGNREGA if they return to power. The new bill increases guaranteed work days but changes the funding structure and allows states to pause work during key agricultural periods.

Key Points: Congress Slams MGNREGA Replacement Bill in Rajya Sabha Debate

  • Bill guarantees 125 days of wage employment per rural household, up from 100 days
  • Opposition demands bill be sent to a Select Committee for review
  • New fund-sharing pattern set at 60:40 between Centre and most states
  • Bill allows states to halt work for 60 days during peak farming seasons
2 min read

Rajya Sabha takes up discussion on bill to replace MGNREGA, Congress members slam provisions

Rajya Sabha debates bill to replace MGNREGA amid fierce Congress opposition, with MPs vowing to restore the original act if they return to power.

"The day we return to power, Gandhi's name will be there, and MNREGA will be restored in its original form. - Congress MP Pramod Tiwari"

New Delhi, December 18

Rajya Sabha on Thursday took up the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB--G RAM G) Bill for consideration and passing.

Opposition members opposed the bill that seeks to replace MGNREGA and pressed that it should be sent to a Select Committee.

The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The discussion in the Rajya Sabha will go beyond midnight.

Participating in the debate, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Pramod Tiwari said Congress will restore the MGNREGA legislation when it comes to power.

"The day we return to power, Gandhi's name will be there, and MNREGA will be restored in its original form. That is our promise. We will bring back Gandhi's name. We will put an end to your Godse-like tendencies," he said, targeting the BJP.

The Bill guarantees 125 days of wage employment per rural household, up from the existing 100 days, for adult members willing to undertake unskilled manual work.

As per Section 22 of the Bill, the fund-sharing pattern between the Central Government and the State Governments will be 60:40, while for the North Eastern States, Himalayan States, and Union Territories (Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, and Jammu and Kashmir), it will be 90:10.

Section 6 of the Bill allows the state governments to notify in advance, a period aggregating to sixty days in a financial year, covering the peak agricultural seasons of sowing and harvesting, when no work will be commenced or executed under the Bill.

Participating in the bill, Congress MP Digvijaya Singh said he doesn't understand the justification for changing the name of the MGNEGA.

"I did not understand the justification given for changing the name of the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA, but if you try to understand it, the ideology behind it becomes clear. This ideology is completely contrary to Mahatma Gandhi's idea of Gram Swaraj," he said.

Opposing the Bill, Congress announced a series of nationwide protests on December 17, accusing the BJP and RSS of attempting to "dismantle rights-based welfare" and replace it with charity controlled from the Centre.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who has studied rural development, the fund-sharing pattern (60:40) could be a major hurdle for poorer states already struggling with finances. The 90:10 for NE and Himalayan states is good, but what about states like Bihar or Odisha?
P
Priyanka N
Why is the debate so focused on names and political point-scoring? Gandhi's name, Godse's name... can we please talk about the actual provisions and how they will impact crores of families? The 125-day guarantee is the real headline.
A
Aman W
MGNREGA was a lifeline during the pandemic for my village. Any replacement must be stronger, not weaker. Sending it to a Select Committee for deeper scrutiny seems like a sensible demand by the opposition.
K
Karthik V
The Congress promise to "restore" the old name and act feels like pure nostalgia politics. The scheme needs reforms for better implementation and less corruption. Let's judge this new bill on its merits, not just its name. 👍
M
Meera T
Accusing the new bill of replacing rights with "charity" is a serious charge. The government must ensure the VB-G RAM G remains a demand-driven, legal right. The core principle of employment on demand should not be diluted.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50