NewKerala.com

Key Points

Rajkummar Rao's advocate explained the details of the 2017 court case regarding a controversial poster from 'Behen Hogi Teri.' The actor was granted conditional bail after surrendering in Jalandhar court. Advocate Darshan Singh Dayal argued the portrayal was purely artistic with no intent to hurt religious sentiments. The case also involved Shruti Haasan, who was later acquitted.

Key Points: Rajkummar Rao Faces Court Case Over Behen Hogi Teri Poster

  • Rajkummar Rao granted bail in 2017 poster case
  • Advocate cites artistic freedom in court defense
  • Shruti Haasan acquitted in same case
  • FIR filed under religious sentiments law
2 min read

Rajkummar Rao's advocate shares details of controversial poster court case during 'Behen Hogi Teri' promotions

Rajkummar Rao's advocate reveals details of the 2017 court case over a controversial poster from 'Behen Hogi Teri' promotions.

"The actor merely played a film character... this is a completely artistic presentation. - Advocate Darshan Singh Dayal"

Jalandhar, July 30

A court hearing was held against Bollywood actor Rajkummar Rao regarding a controversial poster during the promotion of 'Behen Hogi Teri' in 2017.

The hearing was held today in Jalandhar, however, the actor didn't appear in the hearing said his advocate, Darshan Singh Dayal.

Darshan Dayal shared details of the Rajkummar Rao case. The advocate said that in 2017 a poster of Shivaji in the film triggered anger among a section of people.

During this time, a case was registered against actors Rajkumar Rao, Shruti Hassan, the producer, director and deputy director of the film.

The FIR was registered under Section 295A (act done with the intention of inciting religious sentiments), Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) and Section 67 of the IT Act, due to which non-bailable warrants were also issued against the actor, said advocate Darshan Dayal.

Rajkummar Rao surrendered before the court in Jalandhar on July 28 in connection with the case related to his 'Behen Hogi Teri' film. After presenting himself before the court, the actor was granted conditional bail.

"The challan was presented in the court in the absence of the actor. Since the address in the summons was in Delhi, he was not informed about appearing in the court. Actually, the actor is living in Mumbai. On the other hand, Shruti Hassan was acquitted in the case after the court found her innocent. Ajay K Pannalal (Director of the film) has reached the court today, whose petition has been filed in the court," said advocate Darshan.

The petition further stated that the actor merely played a film character, in which his character potrayed the role of Lord Shiva in a Jagran troupe, and this is a completely artistic presentation. There was no intention to hurt the religious sentiments of any community, said advocate Darshan Singh Dayal.

Rajkummar Rao argued that the film "Behen Hogi Teri" had received a Central Board of Film Certification certificate, indicating that the content of the film was not legally objectionable. It also said that his freedom of expression was protected under Article 19(1)(a), according to Darshan.

Behen Hogi Teri was directed by Ajay K Pannalal and starred Rajkummar Rao and Shruti Haasan in the lead roles.

Rajkummar Rao was last seen in the film 'Maalik'.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As someone from Jalandhar, I remember this controversy well. But honestly, after 5 years? The case should have been closed long back. Our courts have more important matters to handle than old film posters.
R
Rohit P
While I understand religious sentiments are important, we must also respect artistic freedom. The character was part of a jagran troupe - it's clearly not meant to offend anyone. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
S
Sarah B
I watched the film and found nothing offensive. In fact, it was a sweet romantic comedy. People need to stop looking for controversies where none exist. Rajkummar is one of our finest actors!
V
Vikram M
The legal system needs reform. How can someone get a non-bailable warrant for a film role? This sets a dangerous precedent for creative professionals. #SupportArtists
K
Kavya N
Respectfully, I think the filmmakers could have been more sensitive when portraying religious figures. Even if it's artistic, we must be careful in a diverse country like India. But legal action after 5 years seems excessive.
D
David E
This is why many international filmmakers hesitate to work in India. The legal uncertainty around creative content needs to be addressed. CBFC approval should be the final word on such matters.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50