NewKerala.com

Key Points

The Rajasthan High Court's division bench has complicated the state's panchayat election process by staying a previous order mandating immediate polls. The state government wants to hold synchronized elections across local bodies, citing ongoing delimitation and district reorganization. This has created a legal and political standoff between the government and the State Election Commission. The situation highlights the complexities of local governance and electoral planning in Rajasthan.

Key Points: Rajasthan HC Stays Panchayat Poll Order Amid Election Standoff

  • Rajasthan HC division bench stays single bench order on panchayat polls
  • State seeks simultaneous elections under 'One State, One Election' plan
  • 134 out of 309 local bodies currently without elected representatives
  • Delimitation and new district creation complicate election process
2 min read

Rajasthan HC stays earlier order on panchayat elections

Rajasthan High Court suspends single bench order on panchayat elections, creating legal tension between state government and State Election Commission

"Since these posts were temporary, no legal rights were violated by their removal - Rajasthan Government Plea"

Jaipur, Aug 25

The Rajasthan High Court's division bench, on Monday, stayed the order of its single bench directing the state government to hold panchayat elections at the earliest and remove government-appointed administrators.

On August 18, the single bench of the high court had ordered the state to conduct elections soon and to discontinue the arrangement of administrators in panchayats.

Challenging this court order, the state government appealed before the division bench.

Hearing the matter on Monday, the bench of Justice S.P. Sharma stayed the earlier court order.

Advocate General Rajendra Prasad, appearing for the Rajasthan government, said that the division bench of the High Court has already reserved its judgment on a PIL regarding Panchayat elections and delimitation, and hence the single bench of the High Court should not have interfered in a parallel case.

The state government has said that it intends to hold elections for all panchayats and local bodies simultaneously.

To ensure smooth functioning in the interim, outgoing sarpanches were appointed as administrators.

Some were later removed following complaints.

The government's plea said that since these posts were temporary, no legal rights were violated by their removal.

The single bench's order had prompted the State Election Commission (SEC) to announce elections soon.

However, the state government is pushing for simultaneous polls under its 'One State, One Election' plan, citing delays caused by delimitation and the reorganisation of wards after the creation of new districts.

This divergence has led to a tussle between the commission and the state government.

The last ward reorganisation in Rajasthan was carried out in 2019, when the state had 196 urban local bodies. In the past six years, 113 new bodies have been created, where elections will be held for the first time.

At present, 134 out of the 309 bodies are functioning without elected representatives, their administration being managed by appointed officials.

With the High Court resuming hearings and the SEC pushing ahead with preparations, the state government's preference for synchronised polls and the commission's insistence on timely elections have set the stage for a legal and political confrontation in Rajasthan.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Actually, simultaneous elections make sense from administrative and cost perspective. Why waste public money on multiple election cycles? The 'One State, One Election' plan could be more efficient if implemented properly.
S
Sarah B
The legal tussle is concerning. 134 local bodies without elected representatives is too many! People deserve to choose their local leaders rather than having appointed officials making decisions for them.
V
Vikram M
The delimitation issue is genuine though. With new districts and 113 new local bodies created, proper ward reorganization needs to happen first. Rushed elections without proper boundaries would create more problems.
A
Ananya R
Whatever the court decides, they should ensure that development work doesn't suffer in villages. Gram panchayats are crucial for rural infrastructure and welfare schemes. Hope this gets resolved soon! 🙏
M
Michael C
Interesting constitutional question here about separation of powers between judiciary and executive. The courts ordering elections while government wants synchronized polls - both have valid points. Complex situation!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50