NewKerala.com Logo

Rahul Gandhi lacks moral right to call Waqf Amendment Bill 'unconstitutional', says Jagdambika Pal

IANS April 22, 2025 221 views

BJP MP Jagdambika Pal has strongly criticized Rahul Gandhi for labeling the Waqf Amendment Bill as unconstitutional without participating in parliamentary debate. The bill aims to improve management and transparency of Waqf properties, focusing on benefiting marginalized Muslim communities. Pal argues that Gandhi lacks the moral authority to critique the legislation since he did not engage in the 12-hour parliamentary discussion. The bill has been passed into law, with Pal asserting it will bring significant improvements to property management and charitable purposes.

"If Rahul Gandhi is terming the bill unconstitutional... he has no moral right to claim it unconstitutional" - Jagdambika Pal"
Mumbai, April 22: BJP MP and Chairman of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Waqf Amendment Bill, Jagdambika Pal, on Tuesday, criticised the Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi for not participating in the debate and instead claiming the Bill was "unconstitutional".

Key Points

1

BJP challenges Rahul Gandhi's opposition to Waqf Amendment Bill

2

Legislation aims to bring transparency to Waqf property management

3

Mamata Banerjee criticized for resistance to bill implementation

4

Bill seeks to benefit marginalized Muslim communities

"If Rahul Gandhi is terming the bill unconstitutional then as a JPC Chairman I am saying that when there was 12-hour debate held in Parliament why he has not participated in it. Being an LoP what is his responsibility towards the nation and electoral college? If the government is accountable to this Bill and the Treasury bench is also accountable to this Bill the Opposition is also equally responsible. Being an LoP, if he has not participated then he has no moral right to claim it unconstitutional," Pal said at the press conference after participating in the public gathering.

"If someone in JPC or any other party claim that the Bill is unconstitutional, I am ready to have a dialogue with them," he said.

He added that the Waqf Amendment Bill introduced a clause which completely omits Section 40 from the Waqf Act of 1995 which allowed the board to collect information regarding any property which it has reason to believe to be Waqf property.

He claimed that the Congress-led UPA government in 2013 had included the Section 40 ahead of the notification on general elections.

He added that the omission of Section 40 has been undertaken to rationalise the powers of the Board.

The idea was to ensure that Waqf properties are declared only after following due process, he said.

The JPC Chairman said that the Union government could have pushed the Bill for the passage in the Parliament based on the majority but it was not done as the Bill was passed after a debate.

He added that there have been no protests across the country except Murshidabad in West Bengal.

"Why there was a violence? Had police been alert it could have been averted. Till four days, there were incidents of arson and violence. A large number of Hindus were forced to migrate from Murshidabad to Malad by crossing the river. If there is mob lynching then it was a state-sponsored violence," Pal claimed.

He alleged that efforts are on by certain elements to mislead the Muslims as done in the case of Citizenship Amendment Act or scrapping of Article 370.

Pal said that Waqf Amendment Act has become the law of the nation and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had no right to refuse its implementation which is unconstitutional.

"Such statements are being made by Mamata Banerjee with an eye on Assembly elections slated for next year," he remarked.

He asserted that that the Waqf Amendment Act aims to bring transparency, digitise records, and improve the management of Waqf properties for the benefit of marginalised Muslims, particularly Pasmanda Muslims, women, and orphans.

He argued that it has corrected past mismanagement and ensured that Waqf properties serve their intended charitable purpose.

Reader Comments

S
Sarah K.
Interesting perspective from Pal. If Rahul Gandhi had concerns about constitutionality, he should have participated in the debate. You can't criticize from the sidelines. 🤔
A
Amit R.
Finally some transparency in Waqf management! The digitization of records is long overdue. This will help prevent misuse of properties meant for charitable purposes.
P
Priya M.
While I support the bill's intent, Pal's comments about Murshidabad seem unnecessarily inflammatory. We need less rhetoric and more constructive dialogue about these sensitive issues.
R
Rahul S.
The timing of this bill right before elections does raise questions. Both sides play politics with important issues. When will we get leaders who put nation before party?
N
Neha T.
The focus on helping Pasmanda Muslims and orphans is commendable. Hope the implementation matches the promises! 🙏
K
Karan P.
Interesting how Section 40 was added right before 2014 elections and now being removed. Shows how both parties use Waqf for political gains. The cycle continues...

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published

Disclaimer: Comments are the opinions of users and not of this website or it's staff. News stories are provided by news agencies. We do not guarantee their accuracy. Inappropriate content may be removed. By posting, you agree to our terms.

You May Like!