Key Points

Karnataka Industries Minister MB Patil called out actor Prakash Raj for selectively protesting land acquisition only in Karnataka while ignoring larger acquisitions in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. He defended Karnataka's aerospace park plan, citing fair compensation under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act. Patil revealed plans to request two defence corridors for Karnataka during an upcoming meeting with Rajnath Singh. The minister emphasized Karnataka's dominance in India's aerospace sector, contributing 65% nationally.

Key Points: MB Patil Urges Prakash Raj to Protest Land Acquisitions Beyond Karnataka

  • MB Patil highlights Andhra's 10,000-acre land acquisition for industries
  • Karnataka leads India's aerospace sector with 65% contribution
  • Minister defends Devanahalli land acquisition with fair compensation
  • Siddaramaiah to seek two defence corridors for Karnataka
3 min read

Protest land acquisition in other states too: Minister MB Patil to Actor Prakash Raj

Karnataka Minister MB Patil challenges actor Prakash Raj to oppose land acquisitions in Andhra and Tamil Nadu, defending aerospace park plans.

"Does Prakash Raj not see these developments? – MB Patil"

Bengaluru, July 8

MB Patil, Minister for Large and Medium Industries, has urged multilingual actor Prakash Raj to voice his opposition to land acquisition in other states as well, just as he has been doing in Karnataka over the proposed land acquisition in Devanahalli taluk for the Aerospace and Defence Park.

Responding to a media query on the issue at his residence, the minister said, "Here, our government has decided to acquire just 1,282 acres for the proposed hi-tech aerospace and defence park. Whereas in neighbouring Andhra Pradesh, the government has acquired 10,000 acres of land from Madakashira to Penugonda, bordering our state, for a similar purpose and is even offering the land free of cost. Additionally, the Chandrababu Naidu-led government has acquired a further 45,000 acres for other industrial purposes. It has been widely reported in the media that Andhra Pradesh has provided land to companies such as Infosys, Cognizant, and TCS at a cost of just 99 paise per acre. Does Prakash Raj not see these developments?"

He further pointed out that the Tamil Nadu government has been actively expanding industries in Hosur, which is located just 50 km from Bengaluru. "They also plan to build an international airport there. For all such purposes, land is being allotted there at highly subsidised rates. If Andhra succeeds in attracting the aerospace and defence park, companies in this sector may shift their operations to that state, causing losses of unimaginable proportions to Karnataka," Patil observed.

"Karnataka contributes 65% to the country's aerospace and defence sector and holds the top rank nationally. Globally, our aerospace-defence ecosystem is ranked third. The state is home to major players such as HAL, Safran, Boeing, Airbus, Collins, and Lockheed Martin. We already have an aerospace park adjacent to the Devanahalli airport. To strengthen our position further, the government now proposes another aerospace and defence park nearby. Farmers who lose their land will be compensated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013," he explained.

Clarifying his stand, the minister said he held no personal grudge against Prakash Raj. "Even when I served as the Irrigation Minister, I undertook commendable work. Bayyareddy, recognised as a genuine farmers' leader, acknowledged my efforts. Those criticising us now must take this into account," he added. He also mentioned that the Chairman of HAL met him recently, during which he assured government support for land requirements.

Patil further informed that he, along with Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, would meet Defence Minister Rajnath Singh in New Delhi on Wednesday to request the sanctioning of two defence corridor projects for Karnataka.

"As the country's leading contributor to the aerospace and defence sector, Karnataka deserves two defence corridors--one in the Kolar-Chikkaballapura region and the other in the Hubballi-Belagavi belt. We will put this request forward during our meeting with Rajnath Singh," he said. "We need one corridor each in South and North Karnataka. Leading companies such as Aequs already have units in Belagavi," he noted.

"Karnataka should have been granted a defence corridor on merit when Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh were allotted the projects. Even the central government has realised this oversight, and Rajnath Singh himself has acknowledged this. This was also discussed when Rajnath Singh participated in GIM Invest Karnataka 2025," Patil explained. "We are not against projects being sanctioned for other states. We are only demanding what Karnataka rightfully deserves," he emphasised.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
As a Bengaluru resident, I fully support the aerospace park! 🚀 We can't let Tamil Nadu and Andhra take all the investments. The compensation package for farmers seems fair under the 2013 Act. Karnataka must maintain its leadership in this sector!
A
Aditya G
Interesting how land is being given at 99 paise/acre in AP! 🤯 While development is important, such extreme subsidies raise questions. Karnataka's approach seems more balanced. Hope the defence corridors get approved - will create many jobs!
P
Priyanka N
My uncle's farmland is in Devanahalli area. While compensation is promised, we've seen delays in payments in previous projects. Government should ensure transparency and timely payments. Development shouldn't come at farmers' cost.
K
Karthik V
Good that Karnataka is fighting for defence corridors! But why only now? UP and TN got theirs years ago. Our politicians wake up too late sometimes. Better late than never though - Aequs in Belagavi shows our potential.
M
Meera T
As an aerospace engineer, I'm thrilled about this development! ✈️ Karnataka already has HAL, Boeing - expanding the ecosystem will create more high-tech jobs. But government must ensure proper rehabilitation for affected families. Growth with compassion is possible.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50