Key Points

VP Jagdeep Dhankhar has reignited the debate over the Constitution's Preamble by calling its 1976 amendments an Emergency-era betrayal. He described the insertion of 'socialist' and 'secular' as coercive acts that violated India's Sanatan ethos. The remarks align with longstanding RSS demands to restore the original Preamble. Opposition parties are pushing back against what they see as saffron camp's constitutional revisionism.

Key Points: VP Dhankhar Slams 1976 Preamble Changes as Emergency Betrayal

  • VP Dhankhar terms 1976 Preamble changes as forced Emergency-era distortions
  • Links amendments to erosion of India's civilisational values
  • Cites SC rulings to defend original Preamble's sanctity
  • Echoes RSS demand to remove 'socialist', 'secular' labels
2 min read

Preamble tampering a blot on Constitution, betrayal of Sanatan soul: VP Dhankhar

VP Jagdeep Dhankhar calls 1976 Preamble amendments a "festering wound" and betrayal of India's Sanatan ethos, reigniting RSS-backed debate.

"The Preamble is the soul of the Constitution. It was disfigured during the darkest phase of Indian democracy – the Emergency – VP Jagdeep Dhankhar"

New Delhi, June 28

In a strongly worded speech resonating with the ideological spectrum of the RSS, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Saturday launched a blistering critique of the 1976 amendment to the Constitution’s Preamble, calling it a “nasoor” (festering wound) and an "unpardonable insult to the Sanatan soul of India."

Speaking at a book release function at the Vice President’s residence, the VP said, “The Preamble is the soul of the Constitution. It was disfigured during the darkest phase of Indian democracy – the Emergency – when terms like ‘Socialist’, ‘Secular’, and ‘Integrity’ were inserted under coercion.”

Calling the 42nd Amendment “an unjust and illegitimate act,” the VP said, “We altered something that should never have been changed. And that too, not by the will of the people but at a time when the people, the source of power, were behind bars.”

Resonating with long-standing RSS criticism of the secular and socialist labels, the Vice President remarked that no other country in the world has tampered with the Preamble of its Constitution and described the 1976 additions as "a betrayal of our civilisational ethos and the intentions of our Constitution makers."

Quoting from landmark Supreme Court judgments like Kesavananda Bharati and Golaknath, he reminded the audience that the apex court has always treated the Preamble as the guiding light of the Constitution.

Referring to B.R. Ambedkar as a “visionary who lives in our soul,” the Vice President said the sanctity of the Constitution must be preserved and warned against the growing political polarisation and caste-based divisions that threaten India’s unity.

The remarks given by the Vice President are likely to intensify the ongoing debate around restoring the ‘original Preamble’, a demand growing louder in saffron circles.

RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale on Thursday triggered a political storm when he demanded the removal of the terms ‘socialism’ and ‘secularism’ from the Preamble of the Constitution, alleging that they were inserted “forcibly” during the Emergency period.

Since then, opposition parties, including Congress and other national and regional parties, have upped their ante against the RSS for pushing a narrative which has long been brewing in the saffron camps for decades.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I respect VP Dhankhar's views, we must be careful about rewriting history. The terms 'secular' and 'socialist' have become part of India's identity now. Changing them would create unnecessary divisions.
R
Rohit P
This is just political posturing before elections! Why suddenly after 47 years? Our country has bigger issues than debating the Preamble. Focus on unemployment and inflation please!
K
Kavya N
As a law student, I find this debate fascinating. The Preamble is indeed the soul of our Constitution. But we must also consider how these terms have shaped our nation's journey. Maybe a national discussion is needed 🤔
S
Sarah B
Interesting perspective. As an outsider living in India, I've always admired how your Constitution balances tradition and modernity. But changing foundational documents should always be done carefully after wide consultation.
V
Vikram M
The VP is absolutely right! The original Preamble drafted by Ambedkar ji was perfect. These forced additions during Emergency have no place in our sacred Constitution. #RestoreOriginalPreamble
A
Ananya R
Whether we keep these words or remove them, what matters is how we practice these values in reality. India has always been secular and socialist in spirit since ancient times. The words don't change that truth.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50