Pakistan's 27th Amendment: How Military and Judiciary Face Historic Restructuring

Pakistan's parliament is set to pass the landmark 27th Constitutional Amendment that will reshape the country's military and judicial systems. The legislation creates a new Federal Constitutional Court to handle constitutional matters alongside the Supreme Court. Opposition leaders are fiercely protesting the bill, calling it undemocratic and politically motivated. The reforms also transform the Army Chief into Chief of Defence Forces while introducing new judicial transfer powers.

Key Points: Pakistan Parliament Passes 27th Amendment Bill Military Judiciary

  • Bill creates Federal Constitutional Court sharing powers with Supreme Court
  • Army Chief to become Chief of Defence Forces with expanded authority
  • Opposition parties boycott proceedings and tear bill copies in protest
  • Judicial Commission gains power to transfer judges between high courts
  • Presidential immunity limited under new constitutional framework
  • Military reforms preserve honorary ranks while adding oversight
4 min read

Pakistan Parliament set to pass 27th Amendment Bill reshaping military, judiciary structures

Pakistan's National Assembly passes sweeping 27th Constitutional Amendment, restructuring military command and creating Federal Constitutional Court amid opposition protests.

"Today is a day of mourning for democracy - Barrister Gohar Ali Khan"

Islamabad, November 12

Pakistan's National Assembly (NA) on Wednesday resumed its crucial session, with the lower house expected to pass the 27th Constitutional Amendment Bill, a sweeping reform measure aimed at restructuring the country's military and judicial systems, Geo News reported.

The bill, tabled by Pakistan's Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar on Tuesday, requires a two-thirds majority in the 336-member National Assembly for passage, with the ruling coalition, led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) with 125 seats, appearing to have the numbers, with support from its allies including the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) with 74, Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) with 22, Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q), and the Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP), with four seats each, as reported by Geo News.

The 27th Amendment Bill, comprising 59 clauses, was approved by the Senate earlier this week, receiving 64 votes in favour with no opposition votes as the opposition benches boycotted proceedings.

According to Geo News, the proposed legislation seeks to introduce significant changes to the military command structure and judiciary, including the creation of a Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) that will share powers with the Supreme Court, particularly in constitutional matters.

Under the amendment, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff would also assume the title of Pakistan's Chief of Defence Forces, while honorary ranks such as Field Marshal, Marshal of the Air Force, and Admiral of the Fleet would remain lifetime titles.

The FCC would be composed of judges from across provinces with equal representation and empowered to take suo motu notices on constitutional petitions. The amendment also proposes limiting presidential immunity in certain circumstances and restructuring the judicial commission responsible for the appointment and transfer of judges.

Introducing the bill, Tarar said the reform aimed to "establish a clear constitutional framework" for judicial and defence institutions, adding that similar constitutional courts exist in many countries to handle constitutional matters, Geo News reported.

He stressed that the changes were intended to ensure judicial accountability and clarity in administrative powers.

The Law Minister also elaborated on the new judicial transfer provisions, saying that the Judicial Commission would now oversee the movement of judges between high courts.

"If a judge refuses a transfer, they will be considered retired," he explained, adding that both government and opposition members would have representation in the commission, Geo News reported.

The minister said the Supreme Court of Pakistan would focus on civil and criminal cases, while the new Federal Constitutional Court would address constitutional and provincial matters.

He also highlighted that the military reforms included in the bill were designed to "bring constitutional oversight" to defence appointments while preserving military honour and tradition, as reported by Geo News.

Opposition lawmakers, however, denounced the amendment as unconstitutional and politically motivated.

During the debate, Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP) chief Mehmood Khan Achakzai tore a copy of the bill in protest, questioning whether the current parliament--which he said was formed under "Form 47"--had the legitimacy to amend the Constitution, Geo News reported.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan fiercely criticised the legislation, dubbing it the "Baku Amendments" in reference to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's recent visit to Azerbaijan when the cabinet approved the draft.

"Today is a day of mourning for democracy," Gohar said, accusing the government of attempting to bury democratic norms and shield the elite from accountability, as reported by Geo News.

He further alleged that the changes were designed to protect ruling figures from corruption cases and warned that such amendments "cannot serve the public interest."

The debate comes amid heightened political tensions in the country, with both the government and opposition trading accusations of undermining constitutional principles as the historic 27th Amendment inches toward approval.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The opposition boycott raises serious questions about the legitimacy of this amendment. If they're passing it without proper debate, how democratic is this really? Concerns me as someone who believes in strong democratic institutions.
A
Aditya G
Giving more powers to Army Chief while creating parallel courts seems contradictory. On one hand they're strengthening military, on other creating checks? Confusing strategy. Hope this doesn't affect regional peace.
S
Sarah B
As someone who follows international politics, I must say this is quite bold reform. The Federal Constitutional Court concept could actually help in better governance if implemented properly. But the political tensions are worrying.
N
Nikhil C
The provision where judges refusing transfer are considered retired is quite harsh! This could be misused to remove independent-minded judges. Not a good precedent for judicial independence.
K
Kavya N
Hope these reforms bring positive changes for ordinary Pakistanis. When institutions work properly, it benefits everyone in South Asia. Better relations with stable neighbors is good for India too 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50