South Korea's Platform Regulation Dilemma Amid US Trade Tensions

South Korea's antitrust watchdog faces challenges in implementing new platform regulations due to ongoing trade discussions with the United States. FTC Chairman Ju Biung-ghi acknowledged the difficulties while emphasizing that existing laws can still be used to regulate platforms effectively. The commission is currently investigating Baedal Minjok for potential fair trade violations involving delivery service pressures. Meanwhile, President Lee Jae Myung's administration remains committed to curbing market dominance abuses by global platform operators through various regulatory measures.

Key Points: FTC Cites US Trade Issues in Online Platform Regulation Delay

  • US raised concerns about South Korea's platform regulations during $350 billion trade negotiations
  • FTC chairman emphasizes using existing legal systems for platform regulation
  • Watchdog reviewing Baemin for alleged fair trade law violations
  • President Lee Jae Myung pledged new regulations to curb platform dominance
  • FTC plans organizational strengthening to correct market imbalances
2 min read

Online platform legislation 'difficult' amid US trade issues: FTC

South Korea's FTC chairman acknowledges difficulties in platform legislation amid US trade concerns, while emphasizing existing regulatory options and reviewing Baemin's practices.

"It would be difficult to introduce related legislation for the time being as trade issues are still involved - Ju Biung-ghi, FTC Chairman"

Seoul, Nov 23

The head of South Korea's antitrust watchdog has noted difficulties in introducing new legislation to better regulate global online platforms, amid shifting trade dynamics stemming from the United States' trade policy.

Last month, South Korea and the U.S. reached an agreement on the details of South Korea's planned $350 billion investment package tied to a broader trade deal, reports Yonhap news agency.

During the negotiations, Washington reportedly raised concerns over several non-tariff measures adopted by Seoul, including its regulatory approach toward online platforms.

"It remains essential to establish fair and transparent business practices in the platform sector that is deeply embedded in people's daily lives," Ju Biung-ghi, chairman of the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), told reporters.

Ju, however, noted that "it would be difficult" to introduce related legislation for the time being as "trade issues are still involved," apparently signalling difficulties tied to Seoul's trade relations with Washington.

"However, there are still ways to regulate platforms under the existing legal system," he added.

President Lee Jae Myung has pledged to curb abuses of market dominance by global online platform operators through new regulations, including limits on commission fees and bans on unfair practices.

In addition, Ju emphasised that small and venture businesses, small merchants and consumers must be guaranteed full rights to share in the opportunities that innovation provides.

Regarding Baedal Minjok, or Baemin, one of the country's largest food delivery platforms, Ju said the FTC is reviewing whether the company violated fair trade laws and determining the appropriate level of sanctions.

Baemin is accused of pressuring restaurants to use the "Baemin Delivery" service even when they preferred to use their own couriers or those of other companies.

The watchdog is expected to issue a final decision, which could include corrective orders or fines for Woowa Brothers Corp., Baemin's operator, after receiving the company's formal opinion.

"The FTC will revise its policy direction and strengthen its organisation and capabilities to correct imbalances among market participants and create a fair and competitive market environment," Ju said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul R
The Baemin case sounds exactly like what some food delivery apps do here in India. Forcing restaurants to use their delivery services even when they have their own delivery staff. FTC should take strict action! 🚫
A
Aditya G
While I understand the need for fair trade practices, I'm concerned that over-regulation might stifle innovation. There should be a balance between protecting small businesses and allowing platforms to grow. Just my two paise.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see how trade dynamics affect domestic policy. The US seems to be using trade pressure to protect its tech companies abroad. India needs to be careful in our own digital trade negotiations.
M
Meera T
Small merchants and restaurants really suffer when platforms abuse their dominance. Good to see South Korea taking this seriously. Hope our regulators are watching and learning from this case study. 👍
V
Vikram M
The chairman is right - existing laws should be sufficient to regulate platforms if enforced properly. No need for endless new legislation. Just implement what's already there with more teeth! 💪

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50