NHRC's Stern Warning: How 'Sarpanch Pati' Practice Undermines Democracy

The National Human Rights Commission is cracking down on the widespread practice of 'Sarpanch Pati,' where male relatives wield power instead of elected women. It has summoned top officials from 32 states for failing to address this issue. The commission states this proxy governance violates the constitution and undermines women's empowerment. States must now submit action reports or face personal hearings and potential legal consequences.

Key Points: NHRC Summons States Over Proxy Governance in Women-Led Panchayats

  • NHRC issues conditional summons to 32 states for failing to act on proxy governance complaints
  • Practice violates constitutional rights and defeats the purpose of women's reservation
  • Supreme Court has previously deprecated this unlawful 'Sarpanch Pati' system
  • Authorities must appear personally by Dec 30 or face legal action under CPC
4 min read

NHRC flags proxy governance in local bodies; summons states, UTs over 'Sarpanch Pati' practice

NHRC summons 32 states over 'Sarpanch Pati' practice, calling proxy governance a violation of women's constitutional rights and dignity.

"When husbands or other relatives govern in place of elected women representatives, it amounts to a serious violation of women’s dignity, equality, and right to self-determination. - NHRC Statement"

New Delhi, December 14

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), has taken serious cognizance of the continuing and widespread practice of "proxy governance" in Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), particularly in constituencies reserved for women.

This follows a complaint filed by Sushil Verma, former Member of Haryana State Commission for Protection of Child Rights, which was considered by the bench of the Commission headed by Priyank Kanoongo, member NHRC on December 12, an official statement said.

After examining the complaint, the Commission observed that despite constitutional safeguards and judicial pronouncements, elected women representatives are often reduced to nominal heads, while actual administrative and decision-making powers are exercised by their husbands or male relatives, a practice commonly referred to as "Sarpanch Pati" or "Pradhan Pati". The complaint also highlights the informal appointment of relatives of elected women representatives as liaison persons or representatives of MPs and MLAs, leading to undue interference in the functioning of constitutionally mandated local self-governance institutions.

The Commission noted that the Supreme Court, in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 615/2023, has categorically deprecated this unconstitutional and unlawful practice. Such proxy representation undermines the spirit of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, defeats the objective of women's reservation under Article 243D, and violates fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15(3), and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The NHRC further observed that these acts may amount to criminal misconduct under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including offences relating to impersonation of public servants, criminal breach of trust, and unlawful assumption of public functions.

Vide proceedings dated 09.09.2025, a Bench of the Commission presided over by Priyank Kanoongo, Member, NHRC, had already taken cognizance of the matter under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and directed all States and Union Territories to submit Action Taken Reports (ATRs). However, responses were received only from the Governments of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Odisha, and Uttarakhand, and from a few cities in Uttar Pradesh, while 32 States/UTs failed to respond, the statement added.

In view of the seriousness of the issue and continued non-compliance, the Commission has now directed issuance of Conditional Summons under Section 13 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 to the Principal Secretaries of the Departments of Panchayati Raj and Urban Local Bodies of 32 States and Union Territories.

The concerned authorities have been directed to appear personally before the Commission on 30 December 2025 at 11:00 AM, along with detailed Action Taken Reports. If the requisite reports are received by 22 December 2025, personal appearance shall be dispensed with. Failure to comply without lawful excuse will invite action under Order XVI Rules 10 and 12 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, including issuance of warrants.

The Commission has reiterated that women's reservation is meant to ensure real empowerment, dignity, and leadership, not symbolic representation, and that any form of proxy governance strikes at the very root of democracy and the rule of law.

Statement of NHRC Member Priyank Kanoongo read,"The National Human Rights Commission is of the clear view that any form of proxy representation on posts reserved for women, whether in the form of 'Sarpanch Pati' or through any other informal arrangement, is contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. In a democracy, the elected woman representative alone is the lawful holder of the administrative, executive, and decision-making authority of her office."

Further, it said, "The Commission's responsibility is not limited to the protection of rights alone; it also extends to ensuring the effective and meaningful implementation of constitutional provisions. When husbands or other relatives govern in place of elected women representatives, it amounts to a serious violation of women's dignity, equality, and right to self-determination."

"It is for this reason that the Commission has adopted a strict approach to ensure accountability from all States and Union Territories. This action is not confined to any particular State or region, but is a necessary step towards strengthening women's empowerment and reinforcing the credibility and integrity of democratic institutions across the country," the statement added _

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
This is a deep-rooted social issue, not just administrative. Families see the reserved seat as a family ticket to power. The NHRC summons are necessary, but real change needs community awareness and women's education to claim their rightful authority.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in development, I've seen this firsthand. The "Sarpanch Pati" system is a major barrier to genuine grassroots women's leadership. The fact that 32 states/UTs didn't even respond shows how normalized this malpractice is. Shocking.
A
Aman W
While the intent is good, I hope this doesn't become another bureaucratic exercise. Summons and reports are one thing, but will there be follow-up on the ground? Will the actual women sarpanches be given training and protection to exercise power?
K
Kavitha C
This is about dignity and constitutional rights. Article 243D was meant to empower, not just to fill a quota. When a 'Pradhan Pati' takes over, it sends a message that women are incapable. We must support the NHRC's strict approach. 💪
V
Varun X
Respectfully, the NHRC is right on principle, but the ground reality is complex. In many cases, the elected woman may lack formal education or confidence initially. The family "helping" can be a stepping stone. The solution is capacity building, not just punishment.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50