Key Points

The National Green Tribunal is reviewing illegal encroachments along Uttarakhand's Rispana River. State authorities have identified hundreds of structures, with many predating regulatory cutoffs. Concerns remain about proper floodplain demarcation for different return periods. The tribunal has given state departments three months to provide complete data to the National Mission for Clean Ganga.

Key Points: NGT Reviews Rispana River Encroachments and Floodplain Demarcation in Uttarakhand

  • NGT reviews 523 encroachments along Rispana River in Dehradun
  • State removed 150 encroachments but 373 predate 2016 cutoff
  • Floodplain demarcation notification issued but lacks detailed return periods
  • Tribunal gives 3-month deadline for complete floodplain data submission
2 min read

NGT reviews encroachments, floodplain demarcation of Rispana River in Uttarakhand

NGT hears case on Rispana River encroachments, reviews 523 structures. Orders state to provide floodplain data to NMCG within 3 months. Next hearing December 2025.

"The legality of constructions along the river would hinge on several factors - National Green Tribunal"

New Delhi, August 31

The Principal Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT), comprising Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi (Judicial Member) and Dr. Afroz Ahmad (Expert Member), held a hearing in the matter pertaining to illegal encroachments and floodplain management along the Rispana river in Dehradun.

During the hearing, the Tribunal reviewed compliance reports submitted by several state departments, including the Uttarakhand State Pollution Control Board, Pey Jal Nigam, Irrigation Department, and an affidavit filed by the Chief Secretary of the Government of Uttarakhand.

The affidavit detailed the extent of encroachments across various jurisdictions. Within the Dehradun Municipal Corporation limits, 89 encroachments were identified, of which 69 were removed, while 20 were found to have existed prior to March 11, 2016.

In the Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority's jurisdiction, 413 encroachments were recorded, with 66 removed and 347 predating March 2016.

The Mussoorie Nagar Palika Parishad reported the removal of 10 encroachments, while two were longstanding. Additionally, the district administration identified 11 encroachments on non-ZA land, removing 5 and noting that six had existed before March 2016.

The affidavit also mentioned that a final notification for the demarcation of the Rispana river floodplain had been issued in May 2025. However, the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) raised concerns about the adequacy of the state's submissions.

Specifically, the NMCG pointed out that the documents failed to clearly delineate the floodplain's extent across different return periods--namely, 5, 25, and 100 years--and did not specify which structures fell within these zones.

The Tribunal noted that the legality of constructions along the river would hinge on several factors, including whether the land was public or private, whether statutory permissions had been obtained, and whether the structures posed ecological risks or impeded the river's natural flow.

In response, the NGT directed the State of Uttarakhand and its relevant departments to furnish the necessary information to the NMCG within three months. The Director General of the NMCG was instructed to initiate action under Section 6(3) of the River Ganga (Rejuvenation, Protection and Management) Authorities Order, 2016, within six months.

Furthermore, the Tribunal mandated that respondents submit Action Taken Reports within the prescribed timelines. The matter has been scheduled for the next hearing on December 22, 2025. In the interim, the Tribunal's previous order dated December 16, 2024, will remain in abeyance.

The present order has been circulated to all key stakeholders, including the Chief Secretary of Uttarakhand and the Director General of the NMCG, to ensure compliance, it stated.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Why are pre-2016 encroachments being treated differently? A violation is a violation regardless of when it happened. The river doesn't care about cutoff dates! All illegal structures should be removed.
A
Aman W
Good step by NGT but implementation is key. Uttarakhand government has been slow in river conservation efforts. Hope they comply with the 3-month deadline properly this time.
S
Sarah B
The technical details about floodplain demarcation for different return periods (5, 25, 100 years) is actually very important. Without proper mapping, we're just guessing about flood risks. Smart move by NMCG to insist on this.
Vikram M
As a Dehradun resident, I've seen Rispana transform from a clean river to a dumping ground. Encroachments are just one part - we need better waste management and sewage treatment too. Hope this action continues!
N
Nisha Z
The authorities knew about these encroachments for years but acted only when NGT stepped in. This shows lack of political will. We need permanent solutions, not just temporary actions when courts intervene.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50