NewKerala.com

Rahul Gandhi Reveals: Why Amit Shah's "Trembling Hands" Sparked Debate Drama

Rahul Gandhi made some bold claims about Amit Shah's state during a parliamentary debate. He said the Home Minister appeared very nervous and even had trembling hands. The exchange happened during a heated discussion on election reforms and alleged vote irregularities. Shah, for his part, launched a strong counterattack against the opposition's allegations.

Key Points: Rahul Gandhi Claims Amit Shah Nervous During Lok Sabha Speech

  • Rahul Gandhi challenged Amit Shah to an open debate on electoral reforms
  • Shah accused Congress of baseless 'vote theft' allegations
  • The Home Minister warned opposing parties would be 'wiped out' in some states
  • Shah defended the SIR exercise, saying opposition damages India's democratic image
3 min read

'He was very nervous, his hands were trembling': Rahul Gandhi on Amit Shah's LS speech

Rahul Gandhi alleges Home Minister Amit Shah was nervous with trembling hands during a heated Lok Sabha debate on election reforms. Get the full story.

"Amit Shah was very nervous yesterday. He used the wrong language, and his hands were trembling. - Rahul Gandhi"

New Delhi, Dec 11

A day after the debate on the election reforms in the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, on Thursday, made startling claims that Home Minister Amit Shah was "very nervous", “used wrong language” and “his hands were trembling”.

During the discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, which often turned heated, Rahul Gandhi "challenged" Home Minister Amit Shah to an open debate, prompting a firm response from the minister, saying, "I will decide the order of my speech".

As HM Shah countered the opposition’s allegations of “vote chori” and referred to Rahul Gandhi’s claim of “multiple voters at one Haryana house”, the Congress leader stood up and interrupted his speech.

Reacting to the developments outside the House on Thursday, Rahul Gandhi said, “Amit Shah was very nervous yesterday. He used the wrong language, and his hands were trembling.”

“He is under tremendous mental pressure. Everybody saw this yesterday. What I asked him, he did not answer directly. He gave no proof. I have directly challenged him to come to the ground and let us discuss all my press conferences in Parliament. I received no answer. You know the reality,” he claimed.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday mounted a sharp counteroffensive in the Lok Sabha, accusing the Congress of levelling baseless allegations of “vote theft,” while asserting that electoral irregularities date back to the eras of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi.

Amit Shah warned Opposition parties in the Lok Sabha that those who oppose the SIR “will be wiped out” from West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. He added that if the Trinamool Congress continued to oppose the bill, the BJP’s victory in West Bengal is “certain.”

The Union Home Minister slammed the Opposition for spreading “falsehoods” on SIR and launched a strong defence of the exercise, questioning whether democracy can remain safe if the prime minister and chief ministers are allegedly decided by “ghuspathiye”.

By attempting to corner the Centre over the SIR, Amit Shah said the Opposition believes it is tarnishing the government’s image, but in reality, it is damaging the image of India’s democracy.

Shah further highlighted what he called a new and dangerous trend: that when the Opposition loses, it defames the Election Commission and the electoral rolls -- a practice he said is harmful to the country’s democratic fabric.

He added that the BJP has also lost elections, yet it has never questioned the Election Commission.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Shah ji gave a strong, factual reply. Rahul Gandhi's interruptions show he has no substantive arguments left. The historical context about electoral malpractices since Nehru's time is important for the youth to know.
A
Aditya G
Talking about trembling hands is below the belt, yaar. This is not a school fight. We need mature debates on policies that affect our nation's future. Both leaders should show more dignity.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, the Home Minister's point about defaming institutions after losing elections is valid. A strong democracy needs all parties to respect its pillars, like the EC. The personal attacks distract from that crucial message.
K
Karthik V
The challenge for an open debate is interesting! Why not have it? Let them discuss the press conferences and allegations in a proper, televised forum. The public deserves to hear the facts directly, not through filtered claims.
N
Nisha Z
The real issue is whether SIR will make our elections more secure. All this 'he said, she said' is just noise. Please focus on the bill and its implications for the common voter.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50