Key Points

Nepal has officially rejected China's claim that it agreed to support the Global Security Initiative during Prime Minister Oli's recent visit. Foreign Secretary Amrit Bahadur Rai clarified that Nepal only supports the Global Development Initiative, not the security-focused GSI. This reflects Nepal's consistent non-aligned foreign policy that avoids strategic and security alliances. The rejection comes amid China's ongoing pressure on Nepal to join its security framework despite Kathmandu's clear stance.

Key Points: Nepal Rejects China Claim on Global Security Initiative Support

  • Nepal maintains non-aligned foreign policy avoiding security alliances
  • China claimed Nepal supported GSI after Oli-Xi Jinping meeting
  • Nepali embassy statement made no mention of GSI support
  • China has history of making unilateral claims not verified by Nepal
4 min read

Nepal's Foreign Secy rejects China's claim on GSI

Nepal's Foreign Secretary clarifies country only supports Global Development Initiative, rejecting China's claim about GSI backing during PM Oli's Beijing visit.

"Nepal supports the Global Development Initiative's group of friends... Regarding other initiatives, Nepal hasn't supported it - Amrit Bahadur Rai"

Kathmandu, September 4

Nepal on Thursday rejected China's claim that it agreed to support the Global Security Initiative (GSI) during Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's recent visit to China.

Nepal's Foreign Secretary Amrit Bahadur Rai clarified that Nepal has only supported the Global Development Initiative (GDI) and not the GSI or Global Civilisation Initiative (GCI).

"Over China's initiative, Nepal has only supported the Global Development Initiative. Nepal has joined the Global Development Initiative's group of friends, which was formed within the United Nations. Regarding the other initiatives, Nepal hasn't supported it and no agreement has been reached over it, it is clarified hereby," Rai said.

Nepal maintains a non-aligned foreign policy and has consistently rejected the GSI, citing that it contradicts the country's stance on avoiding strategic and security alliances.

The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated on 30 August, following the meeting between Nepali Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and Chinese President Xi Jinping, that Nepal expressed support for China's Global Security Initiative (GSI).

The statement from the Chinese foreign ministry said, "Nepal supports the Global Development Initiative, Global Security Initiative and Global Civilisation Initiative proposed by China."

"The Government of Nepal's (foreign) policy only would exist, it would only prevail," Foreign Secretary Rai added, rejecting the claims of the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

The Embassy of Nepal in Beijing, which also issued a statement about the meeting between Prime Minister Oli and President Xi, made no mention of any support for the GSI. Similarly, China's Foreign Ministry made no comment about the Lipulekh issue, which was clearly stated in the Nepali embassy's release.

The GSI, a security framework proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping in April 2022, aims to promote a new model of international security that, according to Beijing, is based on mutual respect, cooperation, and non-confrontation.

Among these initiatives, some GDI programs have already been implemented in Nepal.

But Nepal has consistently rejected the GSI, saying it contradicts the country's non-aligned foreign policy. Nepal maintains that the GSI is a strategic, security-oriented initiative and that it cannot join such strategic blocs amid rising global multi-polarity.

China has a long history of making unilateral claims in its statements, which usually aren't true. Earlier, the Chinese ambassadors in Kathmandu had publicly stated that many projects, including the Pokhara airport, were part of the BRI, despite Nepal never officially confirming it.

Former Chinese ambassador Hou Yanqi and the current ambassador Chen Song have both faced criticism for such claims. Because Chinese diplomats often claim agreements that were never actually made, Nepal often finds itself in a dilemma over whether to trust everything China says.

Ever since Chinese President Xi introduced the GSI in 2022, Beijing has consistently pressured Nepal to join the initiative. This isn't the first time suspicion has arisen over China trying to push the GSI onto Nepal. On 5 October 2022, then-President Bidya Devi Bhandari sent a video message to a GSI-related conference, prompting criticism at home.

Despite the Ministry of Foreign Affairs advising against it, Bhandari participated, allegedly under the influence of the Chinese embassy in Kathmandu, which had lobbied political leaders, including PM Sher Bahadur Deuba.

There are multiple examples of China pushing the GSI during bilateral visits and meetings. On 29 December 2022, Liu Jinsong, Director-General of the Asia Department of China's Foreign Ministry, urged Nepal's then-ambassador Bishnu Pukar Shrestha to support the GSI. China even released a statement about the meeting, but Nepal's embassy didn't respond publicly. Shrestha admitted he was approached but refused, citing Nepal's non-aligned foreign policy.

Six months later, on 12 June 2023, during a visit to China, Nepal's then-National Assembly Chair Ganesh Timilsina was again approached with the proposal by Zhao Leji, chairman of the standing committee of China's National People's Congress.

Several other senior Chinese officials, including Wang Yi and Liu Jianchao, have raised the GSI in discussions with their Nepali counterparts.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This shows why India needs to strengthen relationships with our neighbors. China's pressure tactics are concerning for the entire region. Nepal's clear stance is commendable.
A
Arjun K
China's "wolf warrior diplomacy" at play again. Making false claims about other countries' positions damages their credibility. Nepal did the right thing by clarifying immediately.
S
Sarah B
As someone following international relations, this pattern of China claiming support that doesn't exist is becoming too frequent. Transparency matters in diplomacy!
V
Vikram M
Nepal's non-aligned policy is wise given its geographical position between two giants. They should continue balancing relationships without compromising sovereignty.
M
Michael C
Interesting how China keeps pushing the GSI despite repeated rejections. This persistent pressure on smaller nations raises concerns about their diplomatic methods.
A
Ananya R
Respect to Nepal for standing firm! 🫡 Small countries often get bullied by bigger powers. This sets a good example for other nations in the region.
K

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50