National Herald case: Delhi court declines to take cognisance of ED's charge sheet against Sonia, Rahul

New Delhi, April 25: A court here on Friday declined to issue notice to Congress Parliamentary Party Chairperson Sonia Gandhi and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi in the alleged National Herald money laundering case as it asked the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to bring more documents on record in respect of the charge sheet filed against political heavyweights.

A special court of the Rouse Avenue Courts was hearing the ED's arguments on taking cognisance of the chargesheet filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Special Judge (PC Act) Vishal Gogne asked the federal anti-money laundering agency to first place the requisite documents on record and remove the defects.

As the ED contended that the court can take cognisance of a prosecution complaint without hearing the accused and, therefore, notices should be issued to the Gandhis and others accused. the judge said: "I cannot pass such an order until satisfied."

The court posted the matter for hearing on May 2.

The federal anti-money laundering agency recently filed a prosecution complaint against senior Congress leaders, including Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, in the National Herald case. Others named in the charge sheet include Congress Overseas Chief Sam Pitroda, Suman Dubey, and others.

The charge sheet, filed before Delhi's Rouse Avenue Courts, values the alleged proceeds of crime to the tune of Rs 988 crore. It is alleged that the Congress leadership had misappropriated property belonging to the Associated Journals Limited (AJL), the original publisher of the National Herald, by converting public trusts into personal assets. The National Herald, a newspaper established by Jawaharlal Nehru and other prominent leaders in 1938, was originally aimed at representing the liberal voice within the Indian National Congress. Published by AJL, the National Herald was a critical tool for Congress during the freedom struggle and post-independence years. Alongside the English publication, AJL also published newspapers in Hindi and Urdu. However, the paper ceased operations in 2008 due to mounting debts exceeding Rs 90 crore.

The controversy over its assets came into focus in 2012 when BJP leader Subramanian Swamy filed a complaint in a trial court, alleging that Congress leaders had engaged in cheating and breach of trust in the process of acquiring AJL. According to Swamy, the firm Young Indian Ltd -- in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi are majority stakeholders -- acquired control over the newspaper's vast assets through a "malicious" takeover aimed at benefiting the party leadership personally.

In the course of the investigation, the ED found that the accused, including Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, used Young Indian to acquire AJL’s assets at a nominal price of Rs 50 lakh. The probe agency claimed that Young Indian, beneficially owned by the Gandhis, effectively took control of AJL’s properties while undervaluing their market worth. In November 2023, the ED attached immovable properties valued at Rs 661 crore and AJL shares worth Rs 90.2 crore, terming them suspected proceeds of crime.

Reader Comments

R

Rahul K.

The court's decision shows the importance of due process. Let's wait for all facts to come out before jumping to conclusions. Justice should be blind to political affiliations.

P

Priya M.

This case has been dragging on for years! 😩 When will we see actual resolution instead of these procedural delays? The public deserves clarity on such serious allegations.

A

Arjun S.

Respectfully, I think the media coverage has been biased. The court simply asked for proper documentation - this is normal procedure. Not a "win" or "loss" for either side yet.

S

Sunita R.

The National Herald was such an important part of our freedom struggle. It's sad to see its legacy caught up in these controversies. Hope the truth comes out soon! 🇮🇳

V

Vikram P.

While I support thorough investigations, I worry about the timing of these cases. Feels like political opponents always face legal troubles when elections are near. Coincidence? 🤔

N

Neha T.

The amount involved is staggering - nearly 1000 crores! Whether guilty or not, politicians need to be more transparent about their financial dealings. Public trust is at stake.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.