Key Points

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has raised serious questions about Minister Govind Rajput's election affidavit, highlighting potential asset concealment. Congress leader Umang Singhar has accused the Mohan Yadav government of deliberately protecting Rajput from investigation. The court noted that significant land purchases worth hundreds of crores were not disclosed in Rajput's official documents. The matter is set for further hearing on October 9, with the court directing additional document submissions from relevant authorities.

Key Points: Mohan Yadav Govt Shields Rajput Amid Asset Concealment Claims

  • Congress exposes alleged asset concealment by Govind Rajput
  • High Court criticizes MP government's deliberate information withholding
  • 64 land plots missing from minister's election affidavit
  • Rajput purchased 40 hectares worth hundreds of crores between 2019-2024
2 min read

Mohan Yadav govt 'shielding' Minister Govind Rajput: MP LoP

Congress alleges MP Minister Govind Rajput hid massive land assets, High Court questions state government's response to serious allegations

"The BJP government is shielding its corrupt ministers - Umang Singhar, Congress Leader"

Bhopal, Sep 26

Congress MLA and LoP in the state Assembly, Umang Singhar, on Friday alleged that Chief Minister Mohan Yadav-led BJP government has been shielding Cabinet Minister Govind Singh Rajput, who has been accused of concealing his assets in the election affidavit.

Talking to media persons in Bhopal, Singhar said the Congress had previously "exposed" Rajput's alleged involvement in the 'transport scam' and provided all related evidence, but the government didn't take any action against the minister.

"The BJP government is shielding its corrupt ministers. Earlier, the government protected Rajput in the transport scam. And now, he is being shielded in connection with not revealing his assets in the election affidavit," Sighar added.

Congress leader Singhar's comments came a day after the Madhya Pradesh High Court, while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on this matter on Thursday, remarked that the government was "deliberately withholding" information from the Election Commission of India.

The court has made this remark while hearing a petition filed by Rajkumar Singh of Sagar district, who alleged that Rajput failed to disclose large tracts of land and property in his nomination papers.

The court observed that while the ECI had found the allegations serious enough to investigate, the state government responded by saying it was "an Election Commission matter," effectively stonewalling the probe.

The bench also noted that the inquiry had been pending ever since and fixed the next hearing for October 9.

During the hearing, the petitioner presented registry and land records of 64 plots allegedly linked to Rajput and his family. These assets were missing from his election affidavit.

According to the report submitted to the court, Rajput, his wife, and sons purchased around 40 hectares of land in Sagar district between 2019 and 2024 worth hundreds of crores of rupees. Yet, the affidavit mentions assets of only Rs 12 crore.

The bench observed that instead of assisting the Election Commission, the state appeared to be siding with the minister.

The court has now directed the Commission to file additional documents and ordered the Madhya Pradesh government and the District Election Officer, Sagar, to submit a status report.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
40 hectares of land worth hundreds of crores not declared? This is exactly why common people lose faith in politics. Hope the court ensures proper investigation. Justice should be blind to political affiliations.
A
Aman W
While the allegations are serious, let's wait for the October 9 hearing. The court will give its final verdict. Sometimes political parties make allegations for political mileage. Due process should be followed.
S
Sarah B
As someone who follows Indian politics, this pattern of protecting allies exists across parties. The system needs stronger accountability measures. The EC should have more power to act independently.
V
Vikram M
If the minister has nothing to hide, why not declare all assets transparently? This kind of behavior damages the reputation of honest politicians who work hard for development. Very disappointing.
N
Nisha Z
The transport scam allegations were also serious. Now this. When will our leaders understand that they are accountable to the public? Hope the court's intervention brings some clarity. 🙏
M
Michael C
Interesting to see how this develops. In many democracies, such serious discrepancies in asset declarations lead to immediate suspension pending investigation. The "stonewalling" observation by court is telling.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50