Key Points

The MIB has upheld the CBFC's certification of 'Udaipur Files', rejecting revision petitions. The ministry confirmed the filmmakers followed all required cuts and edits. Legal disputes and public debate had delayed the film's release. The decision clears the way for its public screening.

Key Points: MIB Clears Udaipur Files After Rejecting Revision Petitions

  • MIB dismisses petitions challenging Udaipur Files certification
  • Filmmakers complied with 55 CBFC cuts and voluntary edits
  • No new evidence found to reverse certification
  • Delhi High Court earlier lifted stay on film release
2 min read

MIB upholds CBFC certification of 'Udaipur Files', rejects revision petition

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting upholds CBFC certification for 'Udaipur Files', allowing its release after legal disputes and public scrutiny.

"The CBFC followed due process and committed no procedural errors in granting certification. – MIB Revisional Authority"

New Delhi, August 6

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) has dismissed all revision petitions challenging the certification of the controversial film 'Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder', thereby clearing the path for its public release.

This decision follows weeks of legal disputes, multiple appeals, and widespread public attention stemming from the film's alleged communal undertones and its depiction of matters still under judicial consideration.

In its final ruling issued on August 6, 2025, the Ministry affirmed several key findings. The Revisional Authority determined that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) had followed due process and committed no procedural errors in granting certification. It noted that the filmmakers had complied with the 55 cuts required by the CBFC and had also carried out additional voluntary edits. Furthermore, the order highlighted that no new evidence or compelling arguments had been presented to warrant a reversal of the certification.

Invoking Section 6(2) of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, the Ministry concluded that there was no legitimate basis to suspend or alter the classification of the film. It underscored that all concerned parties had been provided a fair chance to present their views during the proceedings.

According to the Information and Broadcasting Ministry, Section 6 allows the government to cancel the certification of a film by the Censor Board and suspend its exhibition.

On August 1, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) informed the Delhi High Court that the Central Government has decided to withdraw its directive recommending six cuts in the film 'Udaipur Files'. Noting the statement given by the Additional Solicitor General (ASG), the Delhi High Court disposed of two petitions seeking a stay on the release of the movie.

The film 'Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder' has been in headlines lately, since the Delhi High Court ordered a stay on its release on July 11. The film is based on the 2022 murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor in Rajasthan's Udaipur who was brutally killed by two men in broad daylight.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
As someone from Udaipur, I'm conflicted. While the truth must come out, I hope the film doesn't reopen old wounds for the victim's family. The makers should have consulted them first.
A
Aditya G
The CBFC has done its job properly. 55 cuts is more than enough! Now let's focus on the real issue - ensuring justice for Kanhaiya Lal's family and preventing such horrific incidents in future.
P
Priya S
I respect the court's decision but worry about how such films might affect communal harmony. We've seen how movies can polarize society. Hope the makers show responsibility in their portrayal 🙏
V
Varun X
Good decision! This sets an important precedent against unnecessary censorship. The film industry can't keep walking on eggshells forever. Facts are facts, however uncomfortable they may be.
N
Nisha Z
While I support creative freedom, I hope this film doesn't become a tool for political agendas. The focus should remain on the victim and his family's trauma, not scoring political points.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50