Key Points

The Ministry of External Affairs has firmly refuted Rahul Gandhi's allegations about notifying Pakistan before Operation Sindoor. Jaishankar clarified that any warning was issued during the operation's initial phase, not beforehand. The MEA emphasized that Gandhi's claims are a deliberate misrepresentation of facts. The Press Information Bureau also confirmed that Jaishankar's statement was taken out of context.

Key Points: Jaishankar Refutes Rahul Gandhi's Op Sindoor Pakistan Warning Claim

  • MEA categorically rejects claims of prior Pakistan notification
  • Rahul Gandhi demands accountability for Operation Sindoor
  • Press Information Bureau confirms Jaishankar was misquoted
2 min read

MEA refutes Rahul Gandhi's claim on Op-Sindoor: 'EAM was misquoted, no prior warning to Pak'

MEA strongly denies Rahul Gandhi's allegations about pre-strike Pakistan notification during Operation Sindoor

"We warned Pakistan at the start, which is clearly the early phase after Op Sindoor's commencement - S. Jaishankar, EAM"

New Delhi, May 17

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued a statement on Saturday refuting claims that External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had asserted India informed Pakistan in advance about Operation Sindoor.

The ministry denounced such assertions as a blatant distortion of facts. The MEA external publicity division said that S. Jaishankar had stated that "we had warned Pakistan at the start, which is clearly the early phase after Op Sindoor's commencement".

"This is being falsely represented as being before the commencement. This utter misrepresentation of facts is being called out," the ministry said.

Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, levelled accusations against the Narendra Modi-led government, alleging that it had notified Pakistan about impending strikes on terror infrastructure under Operation Sindoor.

The senior Congress leader characterised this act as a serious transgression and demanded clarity on who sanctioned the move.

On his X handle he wrote, "Informing Pakistan at the start of our attack was a crime. EAM has publicly admitted that GOI (government of India) did it. 1. Who authorised it? 2. ⁠How many aircraft did our airforce lose as a result?"

Responding to these allegations, the MEA firmly dismissed Gandhi's assertions, emphasising that the EAM's remarks had been misconstrued.

The ministry stressed that India had issued a warning to Pakistan during the initial phase of Operation Sindoor--post-commencement--not beforehand.

The MEA's external publicity division reiterated this point, clarifying that Jaishankar had stated: "We warned Pakistan at the start, which is evidently within the early phase after Operation Sindoor commenced."

The ministry condemned attempts to falsely represent this statement as evidence of prior notification.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi vocally criticised EAM Jaishankar's statement, calling the alleged notification to Pakistan a grave misstep.

He questioned the authorisation behind such an action and demanded accountability regarding potential losses incurred by the Indian Air Force as a consequence.

Adding to the controversy, the Kerala unit of the Congress party also circulated a video of S. Jaishankar's statement, pressing the Central government for answers.

However, the Press Information Bureau's fact-checking unit countered these claims, asserting that Jaishankar's words had been misquoted.

The unit clarified: "A social media post falsely implies from External Affairs Minister Dr S. Jaishankar's statement that India informed Pakistan before Operation Sindoor commenced. EAM has been misquoted -- he did not make this statement."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka M.
Why is Rahul Gandhi always so quick to jump on anti-govt narratives without verifying facts? Our armed forces deserve better than being used as political footballs. The MEA clarification makes it clear - warning was given DURING ops, not before. National security shouldn't be politicized!
A
Arjun K.
Both sides need to be more careful with words when discussing military operations. Whether warning was given before or during - why reveal such operational details at all? Pakistan will use this info against us next time. 🤦‍♂️ Desh ka bhaari nuksaan ho sakta hai.
S
Sunita R.
As a military wife, I find this entire debate disrespectful to our forces. Instead of arguing over semantics, we should be united in supporting our brave soldiers who risk their lives in operations like Sindoor. Jai Hind!
R
Rahul D.
The MEA clarification seems convincing, but why is there always confusion around such sensitive matters? Our foreign ministry needs better communication strategy. Pakistan media is already spinning this as India's "admission". Damage control could have been faster.
N
Neha P.
Whether warning was before or after - the important thing is we took strong action against terror camps! That's what matters to common citizens like me. Enough of this blame game between parties. The real enemy is across the border, not in Parliament.
V
Vikram S.
The timing of this controversy is suspicious - just when Pakistan is facing internal crises. Are we helping them divert attention? Both govt and opposition must show maturity in national security matters. Aaj kal har choti baat pe hungama ho jaata hai.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50