MCG Pitch Rated "Unsatisfactory" After Two-Day Ashes Test Collapse

The ICC has rated the Melbourne Cricket Ground pitch "unsatisfactory" following a fourth Ashes Test that concluded in just two days. Match referee Jeff Crowe stated the surface provided an excessive advantage to bowlers, with 36 wickets falling and no batter scoring a half-century. As a result, the MCG has been issued one demerit point, which will remain on its record for five years. Despite England's victory, Australia had already retained the Ashes with a 3-0 series lead.

Key Points: ICC Rates MCG Pitch "Unsatisfactory" After 2-Day Ashes Test

  • Pitch deemed too bowler-friendly
  • 36 wickets fell in 142 overs
  • MCG receives one demerit point
  • England's first Test win in Australia since 2011
2 min read

MCG pitch for Boxing Day Ashes Test rated "unsatisfactory"MCG pitch for Boxing Day Ashes Test rated "Unsatisfactory"

The ICC has given the MCG pitch an "unsatisfactory" rating after the Boxing Day Ashes Test ended in just two days, awarding the venue a demerit point.

"The MCG pitch was too much in favour of the bowlers. - Jeff Crowe, ICC Match Referee"

Melbourne, December 29

The Melbourne Cricket Ground pitch has been rated "unsatisfactory" by the ICC after the fourth Ashes Test between Australia and England ended in just two days, as per the ICC's website.

This decision was made because the pitch was deemed too favourable to bowlers, with 36 wickets falling in 142 overs and no batter scoring a half-century.

As a result, the MCG has received one demerit point under the ICC Pitch and Outfield Monitoring Process, which will remain active for the next five years.

Match referee Jeff Crowe explained that the pitch's condition gave bowlers an unfair advantage, contributing to the match's rapid conclusion. England won the test by four wickets, securing their first Test victory in Australia since 2011.

"The MCG pitch was too much in favour of the bowlers. With 20 wickets falling on the first day, 16 on the second day and no batter even reaching a half-century, the pitch was 'Unsatisfactory' as per the guidelines and the venue gets one demerit point," said Jeff Crowe of the Emirates ICC Elite Panel of Match Referees, as quoted by ICC's website.

Notably, all the 36 wickets were taken by pacers in just two days of play.

In the fourth Ashes Test, England won the toss and chose to bat, applying immediate pressure with an aggressive pace attack. Josh Tongue led the charge with figures of 5/45 as Australia were all out for just 152, with Michael Neser being the top scorer with 35.

Looking to take advantage of the low total, England found the conditions just as demanding and were bowled out for 110 in under 30 overs, as only three of their players could cross the 10-run mark, with Harry Brook's 41 being the top score for the side.

Australia began their second innings on the opening day itself, with 20 wickets falling in a dramatic day of cricket. The pattern continued on Day 2 as well, as Australia could only manage 132, despite Travis Head's 46 -- the highest individual score of the match -- while England's bowlers maintained relentless pressure with Brydon Carse and captain Ben Stokes claiming four and three wickets, respectively.

England completed the chase of 175 in 32.2 overs, losing six wickets, with key contributions from Zak Crawley (37), Ben Duckett (34) and Jacob Bethell (40).

Although England claimed their first Test win in Australia since 2011, Australia had already secured the Ashes by winning the opening three matches to gain an unassailable 3-0 lead.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As a neutral fan, it was exciting to watch so many wickets fall, but it's not sustainable. Test cricket needs to survive. If every pitch is like this, the format will die. A bit of help for bowlers is fine, but this was too extreme.
A
Arjun K
Frankly, I enjoyed the match! After so many flat tracks producing boring draws, this was a thrilling change. Yes, the balance was off, but it was a proper test of technique. Our Indian batters would have struggled too, but our bowlers would have loved it! 😅
P
Priya S
One demerit point seems too lenient. The Boxing Day Test is a marquee event. The curators have one job. This kind of pitch makes a mockery of the players' skills and the fans' investment. Hope they fix it before India tours there next.
M
Michael C
Respectfully, I disagree with the "unsatisfactory" rating. It was a challenging pitch, but isn't that what Test cricket is about? Adapting to conditions? The highest score was only 46, which shows it was tough for everyone, not just one team. Sometimes we over-regulate the game.
K
Kavya N
The real story is England finally winning a Test in Australia after 11 years! 🎉 Even on a difficult pitch, they held their nerve. But yes, for the health of the game, we need better pitches. A two-day Test feels like a T20 match with a white kit.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50