Maharashtra's Voter Roll Mystery: Why Duplicate Names Spark Election Concerns

The Maharashtra State Election Commission has ordered authorities to verify potential duplicate names in electoral rolls ahead of local body elections. Opposition parties have been protesting voter list errors that allegedly persisted since the 2024 Assembly elections. The commission confirmed that VVPAT machines won't be used as there's no legal provision for them in local polls. A technical committee is currently studying VVPAT implementation for the multi-member ward system used in most local body elections.

Key Points: Maharashtra SEC Orders Duplicate Voter Verification Amid Opposition Protests

  • SEC directs verification of duplicate voters marked with special symbols in electoral rolls
  • Opposition parties protest voter list errors from 2024 Assembly elections
  • No VVPAT provision exists for local body elections under current laws
  • Technical committee studying VVPAT implementation for multi-member ward system
4 min read

'Maintain transparency': Maha SEC directs checking of duplicate names in electoral rolls

Maharashtra SEC directs authorities to check duplicate names in electoral rolls while confirming no VVPAT use in local body elections amid opposition protests over voter list accuracy.

"The name of a potential duplicate voter in the draft or final electoral roll of local bodies is marked with a symbol - Maharashtra State Election Commission"

Mumbai, Oct 29

Amid charges of vote theft and bogus and duplicate names in the electoral rolls, Maharashtra State Election Commission (SEC), on Wednesday, directed all concerned authorities to check possible duplicate names in the voter lists, taking appropriate precautions and necessary action in order to maintain transparency and accuracy in the upcoming local and civic body elections to be held in the state.

The SEC also reiterated that there is no provision to use the Voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) in these elections.

The SEC's statement comes days after opposition parties had alleged that the menace of duplicate names in the voters' list was not handled by the poll body despite receiving complaints during the 2024 state Assembly elections.

The opposition parties have organised a protest in Mumbai in this regard and they have demanded that the elections to the local and civic body should be held only after rectifying the errors in the electoral rolls.

The SEC said that "The name of a potential duplicate voter in the draft or final electoral roll of local bodies is marked with a symbol. These potential duplicate voters will be checked locally to verify whether they are actually the same person or different persons. After the initial check of the name, gender, address and photograph of the voter, if they are found to be similar, an application will be taken from that voter in the prescribed format stating the exact ward, Zilla Parishad Election Division/Panchayat Samiti constituency where the voter will vote. Such a voter will not be able to vote at any of the remaining polling stations".

It added that if no response is received from a voter with a possible duplicate name, an undertaking in the prescribed format will be taken from the voter, saying that the voter has not voted and will not vote at any other polling station with his name, if such a voter comes to the polling station to vote.

"Such a voter will be allowed to vote only after strict identification," it said.

"There is no provision for the use of VVPAT in the laws or rules related to local body elections. Moreover, with some exceptions, almost all local body elections are conducted according to the multi-member ward system. For this, the 'Technical Evaluation Committee' (TEC) of all the State Election Commissions of the country is studying the development of voting machines with VVPAT connection facility and their final report is not yet submitted. Therefore, at present, it is not possible to use VVPAT in these elections," the Commission said in the statement.

Maharashtra State Election Commissioner Dinesh Waghmare had earlier said that no VVPATs will be used in the upcoming local body polls in the state.

The statement issued by the Commission added that the provision was made for the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) in local body elections in the year 2005 in various relevant Acts/rules; but there is no provision in the relevant Acts or rules regarding the use of VVPAT.

"At the same time, with some exceptions, the multi-member ward system is applicable in almost all local bodies. In the multi-member ward system, each voter has the right to cast an average of three to four votes. Keeping this in mind, the TEC is studying the development of technical specifications regarding VVPAT for these elections. Their report has not been received," it said.

The SEC clarified that after receiving the report of the Technical Specifications of VVPAT from the Technical Evaluation Committee, a suitable decision will be taken in this regard in the future.

"VVPAT has not been used in local body elections so far," it said.

In 1989, Section '61A' was included in the 'Representation of the People Act, 1951' regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in Lok Sabha and Assembly elections.

Along with this, in 2013, Rules No. '49A' to '49X' and other rules were made under the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, regarding the use of VVPAT.

Accordingly, Electronic Voting Machines and VVPATs are used by the Election Commission of India in Lok Sabha and Assembly elections.

"The elections of local bodies in the state are conducted on the basis of the provisions of the 'Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888', 'Mumbai Provincial Municipal Corporation Act 1949', 'Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Towns Act 1965', 'Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Act 1961' and 'Mumbai Gram Panchayat Act 1958' and the relevant rules. The matter of making changes or amendments in them does not come under the jurisdiction of the State Election Commission," the statement added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
No VVPAT in local elections? That's concerning. Even though it's technically challenging with multi-member wards, transparency should be the priority. The commission should expedite the technical committee's work.
P
Priya S
Good step by SEC! In our housing society, we found 3 people with same names but different flats. This verification process will ensure fair elections. Jai Maharashtra! 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
While I appreciate the effort to clean voter lists, the process seems bureaucratic. Taking undertakings from voters who don't respond? What about elderly or migrant workers who might miss these communications?
A
Ananya R
Local body elections affect our daily lives more than state elections. Glad they're taking duplicate names seriously. Hope this brings more credibility to urban local bodies and panchayats.
V
Vikram M
The opposition's protest was justified. We need clean electoral rolls for true democracy. Better late than never that SEC is acting on this issue. Hope they complete verification before election dates are announced.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50