Key Points

Maharashtra's revised Public Security Bill now specifically targets Left Wing Extremist groups after backlash over its earlier broad wording. The state government dropped the controversial 'urban naxal' term following objections from opposition parties and civil society. Key amendments include higher-ranking investigation officers and a more qualified advisory board. The bill is expected to be tabled in the upcoming monsoon session starting June 30.

Key Points: Maharashtra Public Security Bill Targets Left Wing Extremists in New Draft

  • Bill shifts focus from individuals to Left Wing Extremist groups
  • Advisory board now includes HC judges & prosecutors
  • Opposition forced removal of 'urban naxal' term
  • Investigations to be led by Deputy SP-rank officers
3 min read

Maharashtra Public Security Bill draft now focuses on Left Wing extremists

Maharashtra revises Public Security Bill to focus on Left Wing Extremists, dropping 'urban naxal' label after opposition criticism.

"We opposed it – Committee member on initial proposal for sub-inspector-led investigations"

Mumbai, June 26

The draft of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024 has now amended the objective from 'certain unlawful activities of individuals and organisations' to 'certain unlawful activities of Left Wing Extremist (LWE) organisations or similar organisations.'

The report for the same by the Joint Select Committee of legislators was accepted in the final meeting of the committee on Thursday. The bill, which was presented in the state legislature during the winter session last year, was criticised over its powers to blame individuals as 'urban naxals,' following which Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis announced to refer it to the joint select committee. The bill is now likely to be presented in the upcoming monsoon session of the state legislature starting from June 30.

The amendment to the bill was on the cards, especially in the wake of strong objections raised by opposition parties, various organisations representing civil society, and NGOs. They had opposed the bill for giving sweeping powers to the state government. A 25-member joint select committee, chaired by Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule, held five meetings. In its report, it has recommended that the state government should bring out an inclusive policy to stop and prevent youth who get attracted towards Maoist ideology and to reintegrate them into the mainstream.

Apart from the objective of the bill, two other amendments of the committee have also been accepted in the draft of the bill. The advisory board, which will be declaring a particular organisation as unlawful, will have a working High Court justice or retired justice, a retired district judge, and a public prosecutor of the High Court. The high court justice or retired justice will be the chairperson of the committee.

Earlier, the advisory board was made up only of a high court justice or retired justice or those who are of equal qualification. As per the third amendment in the draft, the investigation officer of crimes under this bill will be no less than a Deputy Superintendent of Police. The committee members had pointed out during meetings that the cases registered under the UAPA and Prevention of Atrocities Act are probed by an officer of the rank of no less than a deputy superintendent of police.

“In the earlier proposed draft, the investigation was to be carried out by a Police sub-inspector rank officer. We opposed it,” said a member of the committee.

Bawankule on May 21 had said that the state government hopes to seek the passage of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, in the ensuing monsoon session of the state legislature scheduled to start from June 30. Bawankule said, “In four states, there is a similar act, and the state government expects the passage of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, in the coming monsoon session. The legislation proposes to contain the urban naxal menace and provide more effective prevention of certain unlawful activities of individuals and organisations.” However, now the word urban naxal has been dropped in the amended bill.

Sanjay Jog can be contacted at sanjay.j@ians.in

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
R
Rahul P.
Finally some clarity in the bill! The earlier version was too vague and could have been misused. Focusing specifically on LWE makes sense given Maharashtra's history with naxalite activities. Hope the rehabilitation measures for misguided youth work effectively. 👍
P
Priya M.
While I understand the need for security, I'm concerned about how "similar organizations" will be defined. The advisory board having senior judges is good, but we must ensure this doesn't become a tool to suppress legitimate dissent. The devil is in the implementation!
A
Amit K.
Good move by Maharashtra govt! Naxalism has destroyed many lives in rural areas. The focus on rehabilitation shows they're not just punishing but trying to solve the root cause. Hope other states follow this balanced approach.
S
Sunita R.
The removal of 'urban naxal' term is wise. That label was being thrown around too casually before. But I worry about tribal youth being unfairly targeted - we've seen this happen with other security laws. The advisory board must be truly independent.
V
Vikram S.
As someone from Gadchiroli, I welcome this bill. Naxal violence has affected our daily lives for decades. But government should also address why youth join them - lack of development, unemployment. Only laws won't solve the problem.
N
Neha T.
The committee has done good work by improving safeguards. Having higher ranking officers investigate and experienced judges on board reduces chances of misuse. But civil society must remain vigilant - such laws can always be twisted if not monitored properly.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50