Court Battle for Ritual: How a Temple Defiance Sparked CISF Protection Order

The Madurai Bench had to step in after its earlier order was ignored. It found the temple management clearly violated the directive to facilitate the lamp lighting. Now, the petitioner and ten others get to perform the ritual with CISF security. This all unfolded amid existing prohibitory orders at the hilltop temple.

Key Points: Madurai Bench Allows Karthigai Deepam Lighting Under CISF Security

  • Justice G R Swaminathan found authorities breached a December 1 court order on the ritual
  • The temple lit a lamp elsewhere but failed to comply at the specified Deepathoon location
  • The court noted the temple's appeal was filed late and in a defective format
  • Prohibitory orders under Section 163 were imposed at Thiruparankundram to maintain law and order
3 min read

Madurai Bench allows petitioner, 10 others to light Karthigai Deepam under CISF security

Madras HC orders CISF protection for devotees to light Karthigai Deepam after finding temple authorities willfully disobeyed its earlier court order.

"The police are disrespecting the court order for votes and the problem lies with the government. - Petitioner Rama Ravikumar"

Madurai, December 4

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed that the petitioner along with ten others be permitted to go up to the Deepam pillar on the Thirupparankundram hilltop to light the Karthigai Deepam, while ordering the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) to provide adequate security, after it found that its earlier order on the ritual had been wilfully disobeyed.

Justice G R Swaminathan, hearing a contempt petition filed hours before the annual Karthigai Deepam lighting ceremony, observed that the authorities had "beyond dispute" breached the court's December 1 order directing the Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy Temple management to facilitate the lighting of the Deepam at the lower peak of the hillock, known as Deepathoon.

Although the temple had lit the lamp at Uchi Pillaiyar Temple at 6 pm on Wednesday, the court-recorded directive to light the Deepam at Deepathoon had not been complied with.

The judge noted that the contempt plea was moved on Wednesday after the petitioner alleged that no arrangements had been made to honour the court's order, raising the possibility of a breach during the evening's ritual. When the matter was taken up at 5 pm, the Additional Advocate General argued that the plea was "premature", prompting the court to pass over the matter to 6.05 pm. When the hearing resumed, the judge remarked that the violation was clear, as the Deepathoon Deepam remained unlit.

The court also noted that the temple's Executive Officer had filed a writ appeal only on December 2, and that, too, in a defective format, suggesting, according to the judge, an attempt to delay compliance.

The judge observed that the Dargha, which the court said would be the truly aggrieved party, had not filed any appeal, adding that the temple itself had no reason to oppose the December 1 order.

Reacting to the Karthigai Deepam row, Petitioner Rama Ravikumar asserted that the police are disrespecting the court order for votes and the problem lies with the government.

"We gave the temple administration a copy of the court order and all the items required for lighting the lamp, and informed them that, as per the court order, the lamp must be lit on the Deepa Stambam located at the top of the hill. But until 2 p.m., no work was done on the lamp post. The court said that the petitioner and 10 others were allowed to light the lamp with CISF protection," the Petitioner told reporters.

"However, the police are saying that due to the Section 144 prohibitory order, they will arrest even the CISF officers if they proceed. Do Hindus not have the right to worship in this country? We have no issues with the Muslims in this town. The problem lies with the government. They are disrespecting the court order for votes. We will face this legally. According to the law, the Thiruparankundram Deepam will be lit," he added.

Meanwhile, Karthigai Deepam festivities continued across Tamil Nadu. In Madurai, households and commercial establishments lit traditional lamps, while the Meenakshi Temple drew large crowds as thousands of clay lamps illuminated its premises.

At Thiruparankundram, prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (formerly Section 144 CrPC) were imposed to maintain law and order amid rising tensions over the Deepam ritual.

Special rituals were also held at the Pahampiriyal Udanurai Sankara Rameswarar Temple in Thoothukudi. At the same time, the Pattabhishekam (Coronation) ceremony took place at Thiruparankundram Subramaniaswamy Temple as part of the 10-day Karthigai Deepam festival, which began on November 24 and will continue until December 7.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
This is a clear case of the administration failing in its duty. The court gave an order on Dec 1st, and they waited until the last minute, filed a defective appeal... all tactics to delay. Why should devotees have to fight so hard for a centuries-old ritual? The CISF involvement shows how serious the situation had become.
V
Vikram M
While I fully support the right to worship, I'm concerned about the law and order situation. Section 144 was imposed for a reason. The court ordering CISF protection is unprecedented for a temple ritual. I hope peace prevails and the beautiful festival of lights isn't marred by conflict. The focus should be on devotion, not litigation.
A
Arjun K
Respectfully, the petitioner's statement about "votes" politicizes a religious issue. The government's primary job is maintaining peace in sensitive areas. The Dargha didn't even appeal, as the court noted. Maybe the temple administration was simply being cautious? The judiciary has intervened, now let's hope for an amicable solution.
P
Priya S
Karthigai Deepam is about light overcoming darkness. It's sad that such a beautiful festival in Madurai, our temple city, needs court orders and paramilitary security. The Meenakshi Temple celebrations looked peaceful and glorious. Why can't the same spirit apply at Thiruparankundram? The authorities need better coordination.
M
Michael C
Observing this from outside, it's fascinating yet concerning. The Indian judiciary's active role in regulating religious ceremonies is quite unique. The speed of the contempt hearing is impressive. However, the core issue of balancing religious rights with public order is a

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50