Key Points

The Madras High Court has strongly criticized the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption for its prolonged delays in investigating a significant corruption case. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh expressed serious concerns about the agency's lack of progress in probing alleged irregularities during S.P. Velumani's ministerial tenure. The court highlighted the critical importance of maintaining public confidence in the criminal justice system through timely investigations. The DVAC has been given a final opportunity to complete document translations and seek prosecution sanctions, with a warning about potential consequences of continued inaction.

Key Points: Madras HC Slams DVAC for Corruption Case Delays Amid Velumani Probe

  • Madras HC demands swift action in corruption cases against public officials
  • DVAC criticized for delaying investigation into Rs 98.25 crore contract irregularities
  • Justice Venkatesh warns against eroding public trust in justice system
  • Agency given final chance to complete translation and prosecution process
2 min read

Madras HC raps Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption for delays in graft cases

Madras High Court criticizes DVAC for prolonged inaction in high-profile corruption investigation involving former AIADMK Minister S.P. Velumani

"The DVAC, being a specialised anti-corruption agency, ought to have been aware of such requirements - Justice N. Anand Venkatesh"

Chennai, Oct 13

The Madras High Court on Monday came down heavily on the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) for its prolonged inaction in the high-profile corruption cases, stressing that such probes involving Ministers, legislators, and IAS officers must not be allowed to get “ambushed” by endless procedural delays.

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, in his interim order, observed that corruption cases against sitting or former public officials must be pursued swiftly to sustain public confidence in the criminal justice system.

His remarks came while hearing a contempt plea filed by Jayaram Venkatesan of the anti-corruption group Arappor Iyakkam over the DVAC's failure to commence trial in a case registered in 2021.

The case concerns alleged irregularities worth Rs 98.25 crore in the award of municipal contracts during the tenure of former AIADMK Minister S.P. Velumani (2014-2018).

Expressing dismay over the lack of progress, Justice Venkatesh said the DVAC had shown "contumacious conduct" by disobeying earlier court directions. However, he granted the officials one final chance and adjourned the contempt proceedings to November 10, 2025.

Additional Public Prosecutor E. Raj Thilak informed the court that the DVAC would complete translation of all vernacular documents into English within four weeks and then seek the Centre's sanction to prosecute two IAS officers linked to the case.

The judge directed the agency to report progress on the next hearing date and to explain why the officials concerned should not face punishment for non-compliance.

Justice Venkatesh noted that the DVAC had failed to seek an extension when it missed the April 2024 deadline to file charge-sheets and had still shown "no substantial progress" even after the contempt plea was filed.

He rejected the agency's claim that its proposal to the Centre had been returned for want of translated documents, reminding it that the translation requirement had been in effect since October 18, 2024.

"The DVAC, being a specialised anti-corruption agency, ought to have been aware of such requirements. Its conduct certainly hovers around contumacious behaviour," the judge observed, warning that prolonged procedural delays erode faith in the justice system.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Rs 98 crore scam and they're still "translating documents" after all this time? This is exactly why people lose faith in our systems. The DVAC should be held accountable for these deliberate delays.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in governance, I appreciate Justice Venkatesh's strong stance. However, I wish the court had imposed stricter deadlines rather than giving "one final chance" - that's what they always say.
A
Arjun K
Kudos to Arappor Iyakkam for filing the contempt plea! Civil society organizations are doing more than government agencies to fight corruption. We need more such watchdogs. 🙏
V
Vikram M
The translation excuse is laughable. They had since October 2024 and still haven't completed it? This shows complete lack of seriousness. Hope the November 2025 hearing brings some actual action.
M
Michael C
While I agree with the court's frustration, let's also acknowledge that anti-corruption agencies often face political pressure and bureaucratic hurdles. The system needs comprehensive reform, not just blaming one department.
K
Kavya N
This is why ordinary taxpayers feel cheated. We pay our taxes honestly while these massive scams happen and no one gets punished. When will justice be delivered? 😠

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50